2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structural anisotropy of physical and mechanical properties of a Bunter Sandstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a granulated material such as silica sand allows control of certain statistical structural properties including grain geometry, grain size distribution and porosity, which ultimately results in a significant reduction of specimen-to-specimen heterogeneity and, conversely, exact control over the explicit inclusion of heterogeneities within any 3D printed sandstone specimen (Primkulov et al 2017). In contrast with natural materials, which are indeed heterogeneous and anisotropic (Marinos and Hoek 2001;Bewick et al 2009;Menezes and Lempp 2018), 3D printed sandstone analogues enable the possibility of testing specimens with virtually equivalent matrix structures and in the presence of discontinuities and orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a granulated material such as silica sand allows control of certain statistical structural properties including grain geometry, grain size distribution and porosity, which ultimately results in a significant reduction of specimen-to-specimen heterogeneity and, conversely, exact control over the explicit inclusion of heterogeneities within any 3D printed sandstone specimen (Primkulov et al 2017). In contrast with natural materials, which are indeed heterogeneous and anisotropic (Marinos and Hoek 2001;Bewick et al 2009;Menezes and Lempp 2018), 3D printed sandstone analogues enable the possibility of testing specimens with virtually equivalent matrix structures and in the presence of discontinuities and orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of a rock derived from a uniaxial compression test (e.g., [44]) 70 to 134 [45] Average ≈ 200 (range 41-209) [46] 2.33 to 151.6 [47] MPa…”
Section: Uniaxial Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear strength of a material when the stress normal to a shear surface is zero (e.g., [48,49]). Controls where the failure envelope intersects the zero normal stress axis of the Mohr diagram, and the magnitudes of the effective differential stresses needed to create shear fractures 12 [45] 49 to 51 [41] 64 normal to cleavage, 11 when σ 1 30 • to cleavage [42] MPa…”
Section: Cohesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical anisotropy is a key factor that controls the formation of deformation structures. Menezes and Lempp (2018) carry out triaxial compression tests to understand how anisotropy influences the mechanical behaviour and variations of physical properties of Bunter sandstones. They quantify fracture patterns and collect measurements of permeability, compressive strength, Young's modulus, mechanical work during the pre-failure stage and ultrasonic velocities on a series of water-saturated samples.…”
Section: Contents Of This Volumementioning
confidence: 99%