2015
DOI: 10.1090/proc/12902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structure of the second eigenfunctions of the $p$-Laplacian on a ball

Abstract: In this paper, we prove that the second eigenfunctions of the p-Laplacian, p > 1, are not radial on the unit ball in R N , for any N ≥ 2. Our proof relies on the variational characterization of the second eigenvalue and a variant of the deformation lemma. We also construct an infinite sequence of eigenpairs {τ n , Ψ n } such that Ψ n is nonradial and has exactly 2n nodal domains. A few related open problems are also stated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In either case, we have two disjoint domains Ω 1 and Ω 2 such that λ 1 (Ω 1 ) < t + c(t) and λ 1 (Ω 2 ) < c(t).…”
Section: Application To the Fučik Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In either case, we have two disjoint domains Ω 1 and Ω 2 such that λ 1 (Ω 1 ) < t + c(t) and λ 1 (Ω 2 ) < c(t).…”
Section: Application To the Fučik Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the above result as a simple consequence of Theorem 1.1. Moreover, Theorem 1.3 gives a generalization and a simpler proof for Theorem 1.1 of [1] which states the nonradiality of second eigenfunctions of the p-Laplacian on a ball.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being proved by entirely different arguments, our Theorem 1.2 represents the direct generalization of these results for the nonlinear settings under the additional assumptions (O 3 ) and (O 4 ). In the resonant case with the p-Laplacian, the validity of the Payne conjecture was proposed as an open problem even in the case of a ball, see [3,Remark 4.2]. Easily, a ball satisfies (O 1 ) − (O 4 ), and hence Theorem 1.2 applies.…”
Section: The Model Case Of the Nonlinearity Which Satisfiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ 0 and Γ # 0 are the outer boundaries of Ω and Ω # respectively. We call the inequality in (2), as the reverse Faber-Krahn (R-F-K) inequality. A similar inequality for the second Neumann eigenvalue (the first non-zero eigenvalue), namely µ 2 (Ω) ≤ µ 2 (Ω * ) is obtained in [26] by Szegö for planar domains, and in [27] for higher dimensions by Weinberger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Szegö mainly rely on the conformal mapping, and the proof of Weinberger based on construction of a test function using a radial function together with a suitable translation of the origin. In [19], for proving the inequality (2), authors used the interior parallels and an isoperimetric inequality, deduced from an inequality for the interior parallels due to B. Sz. Nagy [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%