2008
DOI: 10.5753/isys.2008.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Support of Activity Patterns in ProWAP: Case Studies, Formal Semantics, Tool Support

Abstract: Nenhum resumo disponível

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, research has mainly focused on pattern detection (e.g. [18], [19]), although a few approaches support modeling [20]. In comparison to other construction support techniques, patterns are more abstract in nature and usually require a thorough interpretation by the modeler, in contrast to element suggestions implemented by recommender systems.…”
Section: On Related Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, research has mainly focused on pattern detection (e.g. [18], [19]), although a few approaches support modeling [20]. In comparison to other construction support techniques, patterns are more abstract in nature and usually require a thorough interpretation by the modeler, in contrast to element suggestions implemented by recommender systems.…”
Section: On Related Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A WAP refers to the description of a recurrent business function as it can be frequently found in business processes [1]. We had developed an empirical study, in which we analyzed more than 200 real-world process models in order to confirm the existence of the seven WAPs [2]. The study showed that the analyzed process models can be designed based on the investigated patterns; i.e., the set of identified WAPs is necessary as well as sufficient to design the 200 process models, at least at a certain level of granularity.…”
Section: Representing Workflow Activity Patterns In Bpmnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The π-process obtained can then be checked with a model ckecking tool. In (Thom et al, 2008) this mapping is defined and a model checking tool is detailed.…”
Section: Business Process Identification and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%