1984
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90093-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the thermally activated field evaporation of surface atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong crystallography dependence of the specimen shape with increase in laser power could be explained by differences in the local field evaporation probability that relates to the local binding energy of the atoms, and thus to surface packing and coordination. Another effect that could play a very important role is the roll-up proposed by Waugh et al [39] and Wada [51] and experimentally observed by Schmidt and Ernst [52]. This refers to a tendency of atoms to migrate to positions of lower coordination, and thus the highest field, at the surface prior departing from the surface.…”
Section: Specimen Shapementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The strong crystallography dependence of the specimen shape with increase in laser power could be explained by differences in the local field evaporation probability that relates to the local binding energy of the atoms, and thus to surface packing and coordination. Another effect that could play a very important role is the roll-up proposed by Waugh et al [39] and Wada [51] and experimentally observed by Schmidt and Ernst [52]. This refers to a tendency of atoms to migrate to positions of lower coordination, and thus the highest field, at the surface prior departing from the surface.…”
Section: Specimen Shapementioning
confidence: 93%
“…These v a l u e s a r e c o n s i s t e n t with t h e observed p u l s e f r a c t i o n e f f e c t , namely t h e p r e f e r e n t i a l f i e l d evaporation of copper a t t h e a p p l i e d d.c. f i e l d , between pulses, i f t h e p u l s e f r a c t i o n i s too s m a l l . The observed temperature dependence of field evaporation can be explained qualitatively as a combination of two effects: i) the increased dependence of the evaporation rate, for each element, on the applied field as the temperature is decreased, and ii) the observed greater temperature dependence of the evaporation field for pure copper than for iron [12]. At higher temperatures therefore, a pulse fraction in excess of 25% would be needed to prevent the d.c. evaporation of copper.…”
Section: These R E S U L T S I N D I C a T E T H A T T H E Pulse F R mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As demonstrated in the early work of Wada [29], the slope of the evaporation field vs. temperature differs for different species. Therefore, by progressively changing the base temperature, it is hoped that conditions on the evaporation field of the precipitates and the matrix could be found, which could greatly reduce the issues associated with local magnification, while maintaining analysis conditions that do not promote surface migration [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%