“…These v a l u e s a r e c o n s i s t e n t with t h e observed p u l s e f r a c t i o n e f f e c t , namely t h e p r e f e r e n t i a l f i e l d evaporation of copper a t t h e a p p l i e d d.c. f i e l d , between pulses, i f t h e p u l s e f r a c t i o n i s too s m a l l . The observed temperature dependence of field evaporation can be explained qualitatively as a combination of two effects: i) the increased dependence of the evaporation rate, for each element, on the applied field as the temperature is decreased, and ii) the observed greater temperature dependence of the evaporation field for pure copper than for iron [12]. At higher temperatures therefore, a pulse fraction in excess of 25% would be needed to prevent the d.c. evaporation of copper.…”