2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the tightness of an LP relaxation for rational optimization and its applications

Abstract: We consider the problem of optimizing a linear rational function subject to totally unimodular (TU) constraints over {0, 1} variables. Such formulations arise in many applications including assortment optimization. We show that a natural extended LP relaxation of the problem is "tight". In other words, any extreme point corresponds to an integral solution. We also consider more general constraints that are not TU but obtained by adding an arbitrary constraint to the set of TU constraints. Using structural insi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach follows very closely the Primal Dual algorithm with knapsack constraints of [10]. However, we also show how to reduce the problem of finding the optimal bid vector to the problem of maximizing the ratio between a linear function of the UCB of the valuations and a linear function of the LCB of the costs, and this problem can be solved in polynomial time for a set of totally unimodular linear constraints [8]. In Section 4, we use the discretization idea introduced in [11], to discretize the continuous bid space in [p 0 , 1], with p 0 being the minimum reserve price across all platforms, by using an grid.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach follows very closely the Primal Dual algorithm with knapsack constraints of [10]. However, we also show how to reduce the problem of finding the optimal bid vector to the problem of maximizing the ratio between a linear function of the UCB of the valuations and a linear function of the LCB of the costs, and this problem can be solved in polynomial time for a set of totally unimodular linear constraints [8]. In Section 4, we use the discretization idea introduced in [11], to discretize the continuous bid space in [p 0 , 1], with p 0 being the minimum reserve price across all platforms, by using an grid.…”
Section: Overview Of Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The number of different arms that is exponential can be reduced in the analysis by pruning out suboptimal arms. The optimal arm according to the U CB and LCB approximations can actually be computed in polynomial time since this is the problem of optimizing a rational function subject to a set of linear constraints described by a totally unimodular matrix [8]. After the feedback is received, the UCB estimation of the rewards and the LCB estimation of the costs are updated.…”
Section: Discrete Bid Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. We use the result in Avadhanula et al (2016) which shows that the rational optimization problem max…”
Section: Identical Choice Model and Common Assortmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal solution of the linear program (21a)-(21i) can easily be transformed into an optimal solution of the original formulation similar to what is done in Avadhanula et al (2016).…”
Section: Identical Choice Model and Common Assortmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are efficient polynomial time algorithms available to solve this optimization problem (e.g., refer to Davis et al [10], Avadhanula et al [7] and Rusmevichientong et al [18]). The details of our procedure are provided in Algorithm 1.…”
Section: A Ts Algorithm With Independent Conjugate Beta Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%