1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: the Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
351
0
21

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
351
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…A widely used approach to causal reasoning is the potential outcome framework, originally due to Neyman (1934), (see also Rubin, 1990), and developed for observational studies by Rubin (1973). Let us define the timing of a life course event as a binary treatment variable T (T =1 if an individual retires at age a and T = 0 if an individual retires at age a * , with a * > a).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely used approach to causal reasoning is the potential outcome framework, originally due to Neyman (1934), (see also Rubin, 1990), and developed for observational studies by Rubin (1973). Let us define the timing of a life course event as a binary treatment variable T (T =1 if an individual retires at age a and T = 0 if an individual retires at age a * , with a * > a).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed in the previous section consists in this case of selecting a stratified sample with the optimal Neyman (1934) allocation, where the variance of the stratum are estimated by means of a previous sample. The notion of optimal inclusion probabilities is thus related to the idea of optimization used by Neyman for the stratified random design.…”
Section: H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the cost of the survey per individual is the same in each country, the classic allocation of the sample for a country is proportional to the product of the population size, N i , by the standard deviation of the interest variable S i , for the same country. It is called the Neyman allocation (Neyman, 1934):…”
Section: Sample Size Estimation Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%