On the Use of Air Quality Monitoring Networks for the Evaluation of Nitrogen Oxide Emission Inventories

Abstract

Abstract:The usefulness of ground based air quality monitoring data for diagnostics of uncertainties in gridded emission inventories is examined. A general probabilistic procedure for comparison of levels of uncertainties in different emission datasets is developed. It implies the evaluation of the agreement between modeling results obtained with these emission datasets and corresponding measurements. This procedure is applied to the evaluation of different datasets for European gridded nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions by using the AirBase monitoring data and the CHIMERE chemistry-transport model. Numerical experiments are performed for two different types of spatial distributions of emission uncertainties and five different types of monitors. The results are also generalized for various levels of uncertainties in simulated and measured data. It is found, in particular, that most informative, from the point of view of diagnostics of NO x emission uncertainties, are the measurements of NO 2 at rural background sites and measurements of ozone at suburban sites situated in the vicinity of intensive sources of emissions. A more precise conclusion regarding the relative accuracy of two emission datasets can be drawn with a larger number of monitors in a network and a higher accuracy of the model and measurements. For example, with a network of 50 rural background NO 2 monitors, the probability of choosing the more certain emission data set is more than 90 percent, if differences in uncertainty of two sets are more than 50 percent. Practical recommendations for designing or evolving surface measurement networks, in light of the study results, are given.

Air quality trends in Europe over the past decade: a first multi-model assessment

“…Such country-level discrepancies -consistently produced by all 6 models -are pointing towards inaccuracies in the national inventory (in which the decreasing trend of NO 2 emission is milder than what was actually observed). However that this is contradictory with the results of (Konovalov and Beekmann, 2008) who compared satellite-derived trends and EMEP inventories and found a good agreement for France. It should be noted that they focused on a different time period (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005) and also a different version of the EMEP expert emissions.…”