2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of conventional and statistical-learning techniques for the analysis of PISA results in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then RFE-CV was applied to identify the accuracy scores of different feature sets. According to the study by Gorostiaga and Rojo-Álvarez (2016), around 20 features can compose the best set in PISA studies. Therefore, the following 4 feature sets of top 10, top 15, top 20 and top 25 features were adopted in the SVM model to calculate their mean accuracy score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then RFE-CV was applied to identify the accuracy scores of different feature sets. According to the study by Gorostiaga and Rojo-Álvarez (2016), around 20 features can compose the best set in PISA studies. Therefore, the following 4 feature sets of top 10, top 15, top 20 and top 25 features were adopted in the SVM model to calculate their mean accuracy score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, raw data were firstly preprocessed by deleting some (N = 20) samples with missing values in more than half columns. Then data imputation was dealt with using the mean value of nearest-neighbor (Gorostiaga & Rojo-Álvarez, 2016). After that, variables in student-level and school-level were integrated according to student ID.…”
Section: Data Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the statistical classification, classification and regression trees (CART) and SVM are two symbolic supervised learning methods of data classification and pattern recognition; however, data analysis in CART is a logic-based analysis, whereas SVM is a rule-based data analysis. CART has been successfully used to analyze PIRLS datasets (Alivernini, 2013), and SVM has recently been effectively utilized in analyzing mathematics literacy in another international benchmark of Program for International Students Assessment (Gorostiaga & Rojo-Álvarez, 2015). CART offers the advantage of providing a straightforward illustration of the correlation…”
Section: Reason For Selecting Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a criterion is further needed to establish the relevance of the reduced set of directions obtained from PCA. For this purpose, we used two linear classifiers, following a similar methodology to the one proposed in [ 21 ]. The use of linear classifiers with the PCA projected signals allows us to determine the relevance of each projection direction by scrutinizing their weights.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%