2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-012-1104-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of effective limit strains to evaluate the forming severity of sheet metal parts after nonlinear loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as there is only one tested data in the left side of FLD, it is difficult to say which model is more applicable for formability prediction of the studied steel. As suggested in [15] the effective strain related FLD (shown in Figure 3 (b)) is less strain path dependent than the traditional FLD in major strain-minor strain space (shown in Figure 3 (a)), the effective related FLD is more suitable for practical forming process. As there is obvious difference of the theoretical FLD models on the left side, more testing data are needed to make better comparison and evaluation of the different theoretical models.…”
Section: Numiform 2016mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as there is only one tested data in the left side of FLD, it is difficult to say which model is more applicable for formability prediction of the studied steel. As suggested in [15] the effective strain related FLD (shown in Figure 3 (b)) is less strain path dependent than the traditional FLD in major strain-minor strain space (shown in Figure 3 (a)), the effective related FLD is more suitable for practical forming process. As there is obvious difference of the theoretical FLD models on the left side, more testing data are needed to make better comparison and evaluation of the different theoretical models.…”
Section: Numiform 2016mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A Von Mises isotropic yield function and a Swift power law hardening equation were used. For M-K model, the initial imperfection parameter f 0 is fixed to 0.995 calculated by surface roughness of the delivered sheets using methods proposed in [15]. 68003007…”
Section: Fld Obtained By Standard Nakajima Testing and Comparison Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forming process will be safe if all the measured effective strains are located under the extended strain-based FLD. (e.g., see [23,24]). Figure 6 compares necking positions or failure locations for a two-layer metallic blank with 63.38mm diameter determined by experiment and FE simulations.…”
Section: A Statistical Forming Limit Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%