2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06)
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2006.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of SIFT Features for Face Authentication

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
178
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
178
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because object recognition requires only coarse features while face recognition needs much more subtle and refined discriminative features. An investigation of SIFT features on face representation has ever been done as the first attempt to analyze the SIFT approach in face analysis context [7]. In their experiment, the performance of SIFT feature was evaluated on a database of 52 persons with 5 training images and 7 testing images per person.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because object recognition requires only coarse features while face recognition needs much more subtle and refined discriminative features. An investigation of SIFT features on face representation has ever been done as the first attempt to analyze the SIFT approach in face analysis context [7]. In their experiment, the performance of SIFT feature was evaluated on a database of 52 persons with 5 training images and 7 testing images per person.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we propose to apply SIFT features on face recognition with only one training sample per person and evaluate its performance under various conditions. Meanwhile, as SIFT can detect person-specific features in different images, we use a Kmeans method instead of overlapping sub-windows in [7] to construct stable effective sub-regions on images and compute the matching similarity of all corresponding region pairs. Moreover, as different sub-regions having different discriminative power we propose a weighting scheme when computing the final average similarity value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], Bicego et al compare three different matching schemes using SIFT descriptors, namely minimum pair distance matching, matching features around the eyes and the mouth, and matching on a regular grid with overlapping subregions. Only test and training features of corresponding subregions are matched.…”
Section: B Face Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HOG features, which have been previously used in applications such as pedestrian detection [7] and face recognition [1], are closely related to the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [18]. SIFT features have emerged as a cutting edge technology for extracting distinctive features from images, to be used in algorithms for tasks like matching different views of an object or scene and face authentication [4]. One of the essential parts of SIFT is that local keypoints are represented using histograms of image gradients which are normalized to be invariant to changes in scale and rotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%