2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the SPH method in nodal diffusion analyses of SFR cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum difference in total decay heat power estimated by DYN3D and Serpent is less than 0.7%, which is very good agreement considering typical nodal power errors in DYN3D are on the order of 1-3% (Nikitin et al, 2015;Bilodid et al, 2018). Serpent for UOX, MOX and TOX fuels are 6.10%, 5.94% and 5.71%, respectively.…”
Section: Pwr Pin Cell With Uox Mox and Tox Fuelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The maximum difference in total decay heat power estimated by DYN3D and Serpent is less than 0.7%, which is very good agreement considering typical nodal power errors in DYN3D are on the order of 1-3% (Nikitin et al, 2015;Bilodid et al, 2018). Serpent for UOX, MOX and TOX fuels are 6.10%, 5.94% and 5.71%, respectively.…”
Section: Pwr Pin Cell With Uox Mox and Tox Fuelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Hence the OX system with larger flux gradient on the outer core edge was more sensitive to perturbation from mesh resolution. nodal solution can be significantly improved as reported in [15]. SVR coefficients show larger departure comparing Ants to Serpent, further analysis is required to study the effect of self-shielding in heterogeneous and homogeneous codes.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ants and Serpentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The width of the models was limited to two times the SA pitch. Additionally, the cross sections of CSD, diluent, and empty hexcan structure were corrected with the SPH method [16][17][18].…”
Section: Serpent/dyn3djjef311mentioning
confidence: 99%