2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-017-1329-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the extended finite element and incremental methods in brittle fracture assessment of key-hole notched polystyrene specimens under mixed mode I/II loading with negative mode I contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of them are energy based, like the strain energy density (SED) (Berto et al, 2012a(Berto et al, , 2017Lazzarin and Berto, 2005;Lazzarin and Zambardi, 2001;Torabi and Berto, 2014) and the J-integral (Barati et al, 2010;Berto and Lazzarin, 2007;Livieri, 2003;Majidi et al, 2018aMajidi et al, , 2018bMatvienko and Morozov, 2004) criteria, and some others are stress based, like the theory of critical distances (TCDs) (Susmel and Taylor, 2008;Taylor, 2006;Taylor et al, 2004), the point stress (PS) and the mean stress (MS) criteria Abedinasab, 2015a, 2015b;Torabi and Alaei, 2016;Torabi and Pirhadi, 2015). Moreover, the two well-known fracture models, namely the finite fracture mechanics (Carpinteri et al, 2008;Leguillon, 2002;Yosibash et al, 2004) and the cohesive zone model (Cendon et al, 2015;Gomez and Elices, 2003;Gomez et al, 2000Gomez et al, , 2006Majidi et al, 2017) are classified as combined stress energy-based models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are energy based, like the strain energy density (SED) (Berto et al, 2012a(Berto et al, , 2017Lazzarin and Berto, 2005;Lazzarin and Zambardi, 2001;Torabi and Berto, 2014) and the J-integral (Barati et al, 2010;Berto and Lazzarin, 2007;Livieri, 2003;Majidi et al, 2018aMajidi et al, , 2018bMatvienko and Morozov, 2004) criteria, and some others are stress based, like the theory of critical distances (TCDs) (Susmel and Taylor, 2008;Taylor, 2006;Taylor et al, 2004), the point stress (PS) and the mean stress (MS) criteria Abedinasab, 2015a, 2015b;Torabi and Alaei, 2016;Torabi and Pirhadi, 2015). Moreover, the two well-known fracture models, namely the finite fracture mechanics (Carpinteri et al, 2008;Leguillon, 2002;Yosibash et al, 2004) and the cohesive zone model (Cendon et al, 2015;Gomez and Elices, 2003;Gomez et al, 2000Gomez et al, , 2006Majidi et al, 2017) are classified as combined stress energy-based models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, different studies from the literature have increased their attention to the influence of notch shapes on the global fracturing response of composite specimens [31,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72], while applying incremental methods and advanced computational methods to follow multi-directional fractures [31,59,[61][62][63][64][65]68,71]. As far as OPA-based materials is concerned, the recent work by Dimitri et al [31] applied the XFEM as computational approach to model semi-circular bending (SCB) tests, compared to the experimental evidences by Barpi et al [36] and Valente et al [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around the fracture front tip, the stress singularity happens for local theory. To model fracture and its evolution, various local theories have been proposed, for example, finite element method (FEM) [4], extended finite element method [5], phase-field fracture method [6][7][8], cracking particle method [9,10], extended finite element method [11], numerical manifold method [12], extended isogeometric analysis (XIGA) for three-dimensional crack [13], meshfree methods [14][15][16]. Another approach for fracture modeling is the nonlocal method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%