2001
DOI: 10.12989/was.2001.4.1.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of tuned mass dampers to suppress vortex shedding induced vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the computer model developed in this study would be capable of simulating the presence of such localized devices, for example, by suitable modification of the parameters describing the nonlinear vortex‐shedding model. Nonlinear effects of stay cables as remedial devices due to an increment of aerodynamic damping associated with the presence of local vibrations. The efficiency of tuned mass dampers on suppressing vortex‐shedding vibrations; this is still a controversial issue. Although some researchers indicate that they work better when a nonlinear force model is used (e.g., Strømmen and Hjorth‐Hansen, 2001; Livesey and Larose, 1995), some situations may arise, in which they seem to be ineffective (Owen et al, 1996). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, the computer model developed in this study would be capable of simulating the presence of such localized devices, for example, by suitable modification of the parameters describing the nonlinear vortex‐shedding model. Nonlinear effects of stay cables as remedial devices due to an increment of aerodynamic damping associated with the presence of local vibrations. The efficiency of tuned mass dampers on suppressing vortex‐shedding vibrations; this is still a controversial issue. Although some researchers indicate that they work better when a nonlinear force model is used (e.g., Strømmen and Hjorth‐Hansen, 2001; Livesey and Larose, 1995), some situations may arise, in which they seem to be ineffective (Owen et al, 1996). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of tuned mass dampers on suppressing vortex‐shedding vibrations; this is still a controversial issue. Although some researchers indicate that they work better when a nonlinear force model is used (e.g., Strømmen and Hjorth‐Hansen, 2001; Livesey and Larose, 1995), some situations may arise, in which they seem to be ineffective (Owen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… F i in Equation is the generalized lift force resulting from the vortex‐shedding effect (forcing term in the VIV force that is independent with structural motion), the power spectral density (PSD) of which can be expressed as SFi()ω=2qV2D3σCL2λπωsBexp[]1ω/ωsB20Lφi2()xitalicdx, where q V = ρU 2 /2 is wind pressure with U denoting wind velocity, σ CL is the RMS of the fluctuating lift coefficient due to vortex shedding, ω s = 2 πUS t / D is vortex‐shedding frequency, S t is Strouhal number, B is load spectrum bandwidth, and λ is a dimensionless parameter that represents the coherency length‐scale of vortices.…”
Section: Bridge Viv Control With Ibdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the control performances of different IBDs, a bridge investigated by Strommen and Hansen is adopted as a case study. This bridge is a suspension bridge with a main span of L = 595 m. The superstructure is a streamlined box deck with a height of 2.5 m and width of 13.6 m. This bridge experienced VIV in its fourth vertical mode with a maximum VIV amplitude of 0.25 m. The modal damping and frequency are ξ ni = 0.24% and ω ni = 2.462 rad ⋅ s −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Case Study and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation