2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-020-00721-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of X-ray Computed Tomography in Assessment of 3D-Printed Components

Abstract: Technical advantages of additive manufacturing (AM) have drawn great attention over the past few years. This cost-effective manufacturing process proved its potential applications in a wide range of fields. Although AM techniques (known as 3D printing) are able to fabricate geometrically complex components, it is necessary to evaluate internal and external dimensions of the printed parts. In this context, x-ray computed tomography (CT) as a nondestructive evaluation technique has been utilized. Indeed, CT can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of them, however, managed to reach relative densities higher than 99.9%. This implies a residual porosity being always present, lowering the mechanical performance of an LB-PBF-printed part, especially in tensile mode or in fatigue-related applications [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Porosity creation in LB-PBF-fabricated samples is a complex process, but the main role in this, however, is currently assigned either to the quality of the powder material, the powder particles’ morphology, inadequate process parameters, instability of the melt pool or the influence of spatters [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of them, however, managed to reach relative densities higher than 99.9%. This implies a residual porosity being always present, lowering the mechanical performance of an LB-PBF-printed part, especially in tensile mode or in fatigue-related applications [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Porosity creation in LB-PBF-fabricated samples is a complex process, but the main role in this, however, is currently assigned either to the quality of the powder material, the powder particles’ morphology, inadequate process parameters, instability of the melt pool or the influence of spatters [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined the relationships between the parameters of the sintering process and the properties of the parts. The authors [ 17 ] described the possibility of using computer tomography (CT) to evaluate the properties of parts produced by additive technology. They analyzed the use of CT from several perspectives (defects, dimensions, density, and roughness).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When some important influencing factors are improperly controlled, the products will have defects. Therefore, CT technology is introduced into the additive manufacturing process to evaluate metal and polymer additive manufacturing components, thereby reducing the number of trial-and-error experiments, shortening the time between design and production, reducing defects, and enabling more products to be cost-effective [ 11 , 12 ]. Laser-directed energy deposition (LDED) is a rapid additive manufacturing technique that uses a spherical powder as the raw material and a high-energy laser beam as the heat source to discretize the 3D model by layering it and then depositing it via point-by-point and layer-by-layer melting, according to the forming path [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%