Advances in Nonlinear Speech Processing
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77347-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Usefulness of Linear and Nonlinear Prediction Residual Signals for Speaker Recognition

Abstract: This paper compares the identification rates of a speaker recognition system using several parameterizations, with special emphasis on the residual signal obtained from linear and nonlinear predictive analysis. It is found that the residual signal is still useful even when using a high dimensional linear predictive analysis. On the other hand, it is shown that the residual signal of a nonlinear analysis contains less useful information, even for a prediction order of 10, than the linear residual signal. This s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vocal tract characteristics are suppressed to obtain the residual form of speech signal. This process include inverse filtering of speech sample where the formants are removed [31]. The suppression of vocal tract characteristics results in an error which is an estimation of glottal excitation called LP residual r(n) given by,…”
Section: A Lp Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vocal tract characteristics are suppressed to obtain the residual form of speech signal. This process include inverse filtering of speech sample where the formants are removed [31]. The suppression of vocal tract characteristics results in an error which is an estimation of glottal excitation called LP residual r(n) given by,…”
Section: A Lp Residualmentioning
confidence: 99%