2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(01)00041-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity of the adiabatic spreading assumption in droplet impact cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20], who measured a constant temperature increase along the droplet radius due to the decreased convective heat transfer in the outward fluid direction. However, numerically, a temperature distribution similar to that obtained here was reported for instance by [13]. These discrepancies arising from experimental and numerical studies can be explained by further detailing the fluid dynamics within the droplet, specifically at the lamella and within the rim, in the attempt to relate the fluid dynamic behaviour with the heat transfer process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[20], who measured a constant temperature increase along the droplet radius due to the decreased convective heat transfer in the outward fluid direction. However, numerically, a temperature distribution similar to that obtained here was reported for instance by [13]. These discrepancies arising from experimental and numerical studies can be explained by further detailing the fluid dynamics within the droplet, specifically at the lamella and within the rim, in the attempt to relate the fluid dynamic behaviour with the heat transfer process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This approximation is considered valid in the relatively small time scale that is investigated here. This is in agreement with the results reported, for instance by [12][13][19][20]. The Continuum Surface Force (CFS) method proposed in [21] was used to model the surface tension as a volumetric force.…”
Section: Radial Distance R [Mm] = ±200supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite being a pioneer work, the MAC code originally implemented, needed some modifications to account for heat transfer which were further introduced in [25] and [26]. Other methods have been used to solve numerically the problem of drop impact onto heated surfaces such as the Lagrangian approach [27]; the Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) [28,29] and the Level Set (LS) methodology ( [30,31]). In [30], the authors highlight different regions of heat flux along the radial direction of the impacting surface, which can be related with the flow in the lamella (the radial liquid film formed as the droplet spreads) and in the rim, surrounding the lamella.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%