2018
DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2017-0170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Virtues of Automated Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship: The New Kid on the Block

Abstract: Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) has proved to be an invaluable tool in medicinal chemistry. Data availability at unprecedented levels through various databases have collaborated to a resurgence in the interest for QSAR. In this context, rapid generation of quality predictive models is highly desirable for hit identification and lead optimization. We showcase the application of an automated QSAR approach, which randomly selects multiple training/test sets and utilizes machine-learning algori… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For AChE, kpl_radial_17 was the best model chosen based on the prediction ranking of the all-model outcomes; BChE, pls_38 and MAO, kpls_desc_44 was chosen respectively. Furthermore, the predictive precision of the model is assessed utilizing different indices like ranking score, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation (SD), Q 2 and R 2 values [81]. Furthermore, the predictive capability of a QSAR model can be assessed by the accompanying statistical attributes of the test set which was suggested by [57]: namely the correlation coefficient R between the predicted and observed activities.…”
Section: Machine Learning Development Of Automated Qsar Model Dataset Generation and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For AChE, kpl_radial_17 was the best model chosen based on the prediction ranking of the all-model outcomes; BChE, pls_38 and MAO, kpls_desc_44 was chosen respectively. Furthermore, the predictive precision of the model is assessed utilizing different indices like ranking score, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation (SD), Q 2 and R 2 values [81]. Furthermore, the predictive capability of a QSAR model can be assessed by the accompanying statistical attributes of the test set which was suggested by [57]: namely the correlation coefficient R between the predicted and observed activities.…”
Section: Machine Learning Development Of Automated Qsar Model Dataset Generation and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AutoQSAR, a machine-learning algorithm provided by Schrödinger suite computed about 497 physicochemical and topological descriptors, alongside a variety of Canvas fingerprints (de Oliveira and Katekawa 2017 ), giving out a large pool of independent variables from which to build models. The AutoQSAR splits the experimental compounds randomly into 75% training set, and 25% test set (Table 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An online converting tool was employed to convert the compounds IC 50 to pIC50 (Selvaraj et al 2011 ). A machine-learning algorithm called AutoQSAR was used to build the QSAR model through automation (de Oliveira and Katekawa 2017 ).…”
Section: Preparation Of Dataset and Generation Of Automated Qsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will then compute the fingerprints and descriptors using machine‐learning statistical methods for creating a predictive QSAR model. The predictive accuracy of the model is evaluated using various parameters such as ranking score, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation (SD), Q 2 , and R 2 values 27 . It is worth mentioning that the present analysis utilizes a total of 100 3C‐like proteinase inhibitors for predictive model development.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive accuracy of the model is evaluated using various parameters such as ranking score, root mean square error (RMSE), standard deviation (SD), Q 2 , and R 2 values. 27 It is worth mentioning that the present analysis utilizes a total of 100 3C-like proteinase inhibitors for predictive model development. The details of the molecules along with their pIC 50 values are presented in Table S1 in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Machine Learning Principles Using Autoqsarmentioning
confidence: 99%