2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1027451015020305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the wetting of aluminum and copper surface by tin-lead melts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the value of the surface tension, an element to explain the wettability by the liquid metals, cannot explain the differences in sensitivity of the studied steel in the three studied liquid metals. Furthermore, generally, similar values of wetting measured on iron surfaces for liquid Pb, LBE and Bi are reported in the literature [43][44][45]. This is due to the resemblance of interactions of Pb and Bi with iron.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, the value of the surface tension, an element to explain the wettability by the liquid metals, cannot explain the differences in sensitivity of the studied steel in the three studied liquid metals. Furthermore, generally, similar values of wetting measured on iron surfaces for liquid Pb, LBE and Bi are reported in the literature [43][44][45]. This is due to the resemblance of interactions of Pb and Bi with iron.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To check the performance of a pure alloy, the Cu 84 Sn 5 powder derived electrode plate was characterized. XRD measurement (Figure S10) showed the best match with a pure phase of alloy form (Cu 32 Sn) 0.12 according to the literature . The alloy was then tested for CO 2 reduction at −0.6 V vs RHE, and only H 2 was generated (−0.15 mA cm –2 , Figure S10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…XRD measurement (Figure S10) showed the best match with a pure phase of alloy form (Cu 32 Sn) 0.12 according to the literature. 59 The alloy was then tested for CO 2 reduction at −0.6 V vs RHE, and only H 2 was generated (−0.15 mA cm −2 , Figure S10). The Cu 84 Sn 5 alloy exhibited approximately half the current density for H 2 compared with OD-Cu at the same applied potential (compare Figures 1a and S10a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%