2005
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2005.850851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ZBDD-based nonenumerative path delay fault coverage calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of [25] proposed a more compact path representation compared to the one in [36]. Specifically, [25] shows that all paths can be represented using one ZDD variable per primary input and one ZDD variable per circuit branch line (referred to as primary lines). This approach is suitable for the PDF test grading problem and it constructs ZDDs with smaller size that those in [36].…”
Section: Zdd-based Path Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work of [25] proposed a more compact path representation compared to the one in [36]. Specifically, [25] shows that all paths can be represented using one ZDD variable per primary input and one ZDD variable per circuit branch line (referred to as primary lines). This approach is suitable for the PDF test grading problem and it constructs ZDDs with smaller size that those in [36].…”
Section: Zdd-based Path Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of previous works considering applications in EDA [8,25,30,32,36,40,44] have shown that paths can be represented compactly using Zero-Suppressed Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (ZDDs) [31], a variant of Binary Decision Diagrams [6]. This representation is very important since the performance of the basic operations on a ZDD is linear to its size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is shown in [7] that the problem of obtaining exact coverage is NP-hard. References [8]- [10] generally employ binary decision diagrams (or variants thereof). However, binary-decision diagram are known to be memory-intensive on certain designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] has shown that problem of obtaining exact coverage is NP-hard. Work in exact heuristics [9,10,11] that employ binary decision diagrams (or variants thereof) are memory-intensive on certain designs, while approximate heuristics [12,13,8,14, 2] must pay additional time penalties if more accuracy is required. If it is desired to use these path coverage estimates in a larger algorithm (such as test pattern generation or timing analysis) as a subroutine, such penalties are unacceptable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%