2009 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/p2p.2009.5284543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On tracking freeriders in gossip protocols

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the very fact that nodes advertise their capabilities may trigger freeriding vocations, where nodes would pretend to be poor in order not to contribute to the dissemination. We are working towards a freerider-tracking protocol for gossip in order to detect and punish freeriding behaviors [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the very fact that nodes advertise their capabilities may trigger freeriding vocations, where nodes would pretend to be poor in order not to contribute to the dissemination. We are working towards a freerider-tracking protocol for gossip in order to detect and punish freeriding behaviors [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, gossip++ cannot do anything in the case of scarce bandwidth, i.e., when the stream rate is very close to the outgoing bandwidth capability. We therefore recognize the need for detecting freeriders as in [17], [36], [37] and plan to complement gossip++ with a lightweight mechanism to detect and expel freeriders.…”
Section: B Hostile Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In peer-to-peer file sharing networks, for example, it is required that (at least a proportion of) peers provide files in response to the requests of others, while in wireless sensor networks nodes must share information with others for the system to determine global properties of the environment. However, there is typically a temptation in such settings for individuals to deviate from the desired behaviour, which is known as the free rider problem [24,29,60]. For example, to save bandwidth, peers may choose not to provide files, and to conserve energy, the nodes in a sensor network may choose not to share information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%