2013
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2012.2225854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Tractability Aspects of Optimal Resource Allocation in OFDMA Systems

Abstract: Joint channel and rate allocation with power minimization in orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA) has attracted extensive attention. Most of the research has dealt with the development of suboptimal but low-complexity algorithms. In this paper, the contributions comprise new insights from revisiting tractability aspects of computing the optimum solution. Previous complexity analyses have been limited by assumptions of fixed power on each subcarrier, or power-rate functions that locally grow ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NP-hardness of the former has been proved in [12]. For L = 1, we conclude that NPM is NP-hard since it is equivalent to MPCA.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Npm Is Np-hardmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The NP-hardness of the former has been proved in [12]. For L = 1, we conclude that NPM is NP-hard since it is equivalent to MPCA.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Npm Is Np-hardmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Thus the UEs in K require more power than p * on each subchannel. Therefore, a special case NPM S is equivalent to MPCA in [12], and NPM is NP-hard and intractable.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Npm Is Np-hardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many algorithms have been proposed for OFDMA channel allocation with the objective of maximizing the sum utility or minimizing the power (e.g., [3]- [5]). The algorithms are mainly heuristics, justified by that OFDMA resource allocation is in general NPhard even if the rate function is well-behaved [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%