1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(91)90006-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On uniformly starlike functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
122
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note [3] that the classical Alexander's result, / G K <i => zf G S* does not hold between the classes UCV and UST. Later on, Ronning [8] introduced a new class Sp of starlike functions related to UCV defined as (1.5) Note that…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note [3] that the classical Alexander's result, / G K <i => zf G S* does not hold between the classes UCV and UST. Later on, Ronning [8] introduced a new class Sp of starlike functions related to UCV defined as (1.5) Note that…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Srivastava an Owa [12]). Goodman ([2] and [3]) defined the following subclasses of K and S*. DEFINITION …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Sharp starlikeness conditions 305 Our aim in this paper is to generalize Theorem 1.1 in various ways that enable us to obtain sharp bounds for other types of starlikeness. One obvious generalization of Theorem 1.1, which we do not include, is to get bounds for starlikeness of order a (Re zf'(z)/f (z) > a).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The This improves the bound AI < 1/(ln) of Goodman [1]. It does not appear to be the best possible except when n 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This class was recently introduced and s[udied by A.W. Goodman [1] who proved in particular the following analytic characterization. Properties of the class UST are difficult to establish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%