Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Langua 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Unifying Misinformation Detection

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce UNIFIEDM2, a general-purpose misinformation model that jointly models multiple domains of misinformation with a single, unified setup. The model is trained to handle four tasks: detecting news bias, clickbait, fake news and verifying rumors. By grouping these tasks together, UNIFIEDM2 learns a richer representation of misinformation, which leads to stateof-the-art or comparable performance across all tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that UNIFIEDM2's learned representation is helpf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stylistic approaches may be simple but yet effective for detecting low-quality human-written fake news, but not so good for machine-generated misinformation, which is stylistically consistent regardless of the underlying motives (Schuster et al, 2020). We then cover recent approaches (Lee et al, 2021b; that leverage a combination of these elements for greater representation power and robustness. Importantly, we also cover works that explore the diachronic bias of fake news detection and portability across data in different time and language settings (Murayama et al, 2021;Gereme et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fake News Detection [60min]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stylistic approaches may be simple but yet effective for detecting low-quality human-written fake news, but not so good for machine-generated misinformation, which is stylistically consistent regardless of the underlying motives (Schuster et al, 2020). We then cover recent approaches (Lee et al, 2021b; that leverage a combination of these elements for greater representation power and robustness. Importantly, we also cover works that explore the diachronic bias of fake news detection and portability across data in different time and language settings (Murayama et al, 2021;Gereme et al, 2021).…”
Section: Fake News Detection [60min]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We review the related work on misinformation concerning our main contributions to (i) the characterization of content spread by this phenomenon and (ii) the models developed to detect such content. In this work, we adopt the definition of misinformation presented in [46], or rather, an umbrella term to include all false or inaccurate information that is spread online, such as rumor, clickbait or fake news, among others [5,23,46], intentionally or unintentionally propagated. Moreover, we only consider content-based classification models, which rely exclusively on textual data from various misleading online sources, such as web articles or social media posts, supporting content pre-bunking [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A work that extends the use of EmoCred with the transformers [42] is presented in [21]. The exploration of model generalizability across various misinformation data sources has been pursued by employing transformers in multi-task learning [29] and transfer learning [23] contexts.…”
Section: Content-based Misinformation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations