1998
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-98-04044-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On uniqueness of invariant means

Abstract: Abstract. The following results on uniqueness of invariant means are shown:(i) Let G be a connected almost simple algebraic group defined over Q.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following is inspired by Bekka's work [3]. Let G be a semisimple real Lie group with finite centre and without compact factors, having property (T ) (cf.…”
Section: Proof Take Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following is inspired by Bekka's work [3]. Let G be a semisimple real Lie group with finite centre and without compact factors, having property (T ) (cf.…”
Section: Proof Take Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be a semisimple real Lie group with finite centre and without compact factors, having property (T ) (cf. [3]; e.g. SL 3 (R)).…”
Section: Proof Take Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first version of this paper, I had sketched a proof, similar to [18, §VII.1], relying on Margulis' arithmeticity theorem and the Harish-Chandra-Borel-Behr-Harder reduction theorem for S-arithmetic lattices. François Maucourant explained to me that this is a direct consequence of property (T ) (actually even of spectral gap), and that it applies more generally to all Lie groups and all simple algebraic groups over local fields [2], [5], [4]. I thank him for allowing me to include this proof here.…”
Section: Facts On Latticesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Denote by λ 0 G/H the restriction of λ G/H to L 2 0 (G/H, µ) (in case µ is infinite, It is a standard fact that L 2 (G/H) has a spectral gap when H is cocompact in G (see [Marg91, Chapter III, Corollary 1.10]). When G is a semisimple Lie group, Theorem 1 is an easy consequence of Lemma 3 in [Bekk98]. Our proof is by reduction to these two cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%