2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2020.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Weisfeiler-Leman invariance: Subgraph counts and related graph properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another idea to analyze disadvantage of GNNs is to inspect the ability of GNNs to count simple local structure indicators such as circles and triangles. Their finds are consistent with GIN [12], which can basically be concluded as: message passing GNNs can not count local structure features that 1-WL test can not count( [5], [13]- [15]). Some works inspect the GNNs' spectral ability and find that GNNs are nothing but low-pass filters [16].…”
Section: The Disadvantage Of Neighbor Averaging Gnnsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Another idea to analyze disadvantage of GNNs is to inspect the ability of GNNs to count simple local structure indicators such as circles and triangles. Their finds are consistent with GIN [12], which can basically be concluded as: message passing GNNs can not count local structure features that 1-WL test can not count( [5], [13]- [15]). Some works inspect the GNNs' spectral ability and find that GNNs are nothing but low-pass filters [16].…”
Section: The Disadvantage Of Neighbor Averaging Gnnsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Towards understanding the expressive power of the algorithm, in a related direction of research, it has been studied which graph properties the WL algorithm can detect, which may become particularly relevant in the graph-learning framework. In this context, Fürer [14] as well as Arvind et al [2] obtained results concerning the ability of the algorithm to detect and count certain subgraphs.…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 illustrates the 4-by-4 Rook's graph and the Shrikhande graph. These are non-isomorphic graphs that are strongly regular of the same parameters, so they cannot be distinguished by 3-WL / 2-FWL (Arvind et al, 2020;Balcilar et al, 2021).…”
Section: F2 Proofs Of Increasing Encoder Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that DS-GNN with 3-WL is strictly stronger than the other two models, we show that it can distinguish the Rook's graph and the Shrikhande graph, which the other two models cannot. Recall that 3-WL cannot distinguish the two because they are both strongly regular graphs of the same parameters (Arvind et al, 2020). Now, note that all depth-1 ego-nets of the Rook's graph consist of two disjoint triangles with a root node that is connected to all nodes.…”
Section: F2 Proofs Of Increasing Encoder Expressivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%