2017
DOI: 10.26493/1855-3974.1054.fcd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On zero sum-partition of Abelian groups into three sets and group distance magic labeling

Abstract: We say that a finite Abelian group Γ has the constant-sum-partition property into t sets (CSP(t)-property) if for every partition n = r 1 + r 2 + . . . + r t of n, with r i ≥ 2 for 2 ≤ i ≤ t, there is a partition of Γ into pairwise disjoint subsets A 1 , A 2 , . . . , A t , such that |A i | = r i and for some ν ∈ Γ, a∈Ai a = ν for 1 ≤ i ≤ t. For ν = g 0 (where g 0 is the identity element of Γ) we say that Γ has zero-sum-partition property into t sets (ZSP(t)-property).A Γ-distance magic labeling of a graph G =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only know the following sufficient and necessary condition for Z m -distance magic labeling of a complete t-partite graph only for t or m odd. Theorem 5.1 ( [11,18]). Let G = K n 1 ,n 2 ,...,nt be a complete t-partite graph of order m such that 1 ≤ n 1 ≤ n 2 ≤ .…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only know the following sufficient and necessary condition for Z m -distance magic labeling of a complete t-partite graph only for t or m odd. Theorem 5.1 ( [11,18]). Let G = K n 1 ,n 2 ,...,nt be a complete t-partite graph of order m such that 1 ≤ n 1 ≤ n 2 ≤ .…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anholcer and Cichacz proved a lemma about a partition of the set of all elements of G of order at most 2 into two zero-sum sets (see [AC16], Lemma 2.4). Their result along with results proved by Cichacz (see [Cic17], Lemma 3.1) give the following lemma.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is an easy observation that the complete p-partite graph is not Z n -distance magic when p = 1. The next theorem completely classifies Z n -distance magic labelings of complete bipartite graphs [2], complete tripartite graphs [3], and complete p-partite graphs for n odd [2].…”
Section: Complete P-partite Graphsmentioning
confidence: 96%