“…Within the realm of internally filtered devices, the highest EQE of IntF-1 devices is at 13.6% [73]; IOEF|PCL generally perform below 30% [48,67,68,73,84,114,135] (with the exception of the work of Higashi et al which reaches 51% with an optimised architecture) [69]; CCN works typically give EQEs in the 1%-20% range [33,34,85,86,98] (the work of Arca et al reaching an EQE of 47%, is an important exception) [73]. The EQEs of most microcavity-based photodetectors are less or much less than 25% [42,65,[136][137][138][139] (the only exception being found in the work of Tang et al [42] who achieved EQEs up to 50% through detailed modelling and design). This is reflective of the fact that internally filtered and microcavity-based strategies are typically prone to greater photoconversion losses.…”