One Cow, One Vote?

Albæk, Svend; Schultz, Christian

doi:10.1111/1467-9442.00083

Cited by 23 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11 For models in which cooperatives are price-takers in their selling market, see Karantininis & Zago (2001), Albaek & Schultz (1997), Sexton (1990).…”

Section: Marketing Cooperative With No Direct Selling: Full Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling: A Cooperative Non Cooperative Game

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To cite this version:Maxime Agbo, Damien Rousselière, Julien Salanié. Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative-non-cooperative game. 2014. halshs-01098762 GROUPE D'ANALYSE ET DE THÉORIE ÉCONOMIQUE LYON -ST ÉTIENNE WP 1438Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative non cooperative game November 21, 2014 AbstractWe build a theoretical model to study a market structure of a marketing cooperative with direct selling, in which many farmers are members of an agricultural marketing cooperative. They can sell their production either to the cooperative or on an oligopolistic local market. We show that the decision to sell to the cooperative induces an anti-competitive effect on the direct selling market.The cooperative facilitates collusion on the local market by making farmers softer competitors on that market. Conversely, direct selling may create a "healthy emulation" among farmers, leading to more production benefiting the cooperative.

show abstract

“…11 For models in which cooperatives are price-takers in their selling market, see Karantininis & Zago (2001), Albaek & Schultz (1997), Sexton (1990).…”

Section: Marketing Cooperative With No Direct Selling: Full Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We could consider that the profit is shared proportionally to the quantity delivered by the farmer. Specifically, farmer i receives a part q i / q j (like investment sharing in cooperatives, as in Albaek & Schultz (1997)). Therefore, the profit of farmer i is…”

Section: Marketing Cooperative With No Direct Selling: Full Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling: A Cooperative Non Cooperative Game

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8 For models in which cooperatives are price-takers in their selling market, see Karantininis & Zago (2001), Albaek & Schultz (1997), Sexton (1990).…”

Section: Marketing Cooperative With No Direct Selling: Full Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We could consider that the profit is shared proportionally to the quantity delivered by the farmer. Specifically, farmer i receives a part qi/ qj (like investment sharing in cooperatives, as in Albaek & Schultz (1997)). Therefore, the profit of farmer i is ui = pcqi − Aiq…”

Section: Marketing Cooperative With No Direct Selling: Full Marketingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…13 Albaek & Schultz (1997) argued that, in many cooperatives (particularly Danish cooperatives), the farmers decide individually on the amount of production to deliver to the cooperative. Also, Giannakas & Fulton (2005) pointed out the prevalence of open-membership cooperatives, and, according to (Petraglia & Rogers, 1999), open-membership implies the cooperative will serve as quantity-taker with respect to members' output.…”

Section: Direct Selling Without Marketing Cooperative: Full Direct Sementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Theory of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We build a theoretical model to study a market structure of a marketing cooperative with direct selling, in which many farmers are members of an agricultural marketing cooperative. They can sell their production either to the cooperative or on a local market. We show that the decision to sell to the cooperative induces an anti-competitive effect on the direct selling market. Conversely, direct selling may create a "healthy emulation" among farmers, leading to more production benefiting the cooperative.

show abstract

The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Building on recent advances in cooperative literature and practice, we conceive two key organizational features of cooperatives: cooperative structure~in terms of control, ownership, and cost0 pricing policies resulting in traditional and re-engineered co-ops! as well as entrepreneurial cooperative firm culture+ Then we conceptualize and test the effect of these organizational features on the market orientation and performance of the cooperative firm relying on a sample of Dutch co-ops+ We cannot establish a systematic influence of the cooperative structure; however, a significant influence of individualized member ownership on performance and of cost0pricing policies on market orientation has been found+ Entrepreneurial firm culture has a significant effect on both market orientation and performance+ @EconLit citations: L200, M310, Q130+#

show abstract

One Cow, One Vote?

Cited by 23 publications

References 10 publications

Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling: A Cooperative Non Cooperative Game

Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling: A Cooperative Non Cooperative Game

A Theory of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives with Direct Selling

The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About