2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0001924000008599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-dimensional model of a pulsed plasma thruster

Abstract: This paper presents a modified one dimensional model for the pulsed plasma thruster. The model takes into account the impact of thruster geometry and capacitor initial energy on plasma inductance and resistance, as well as the ablated mass per pulse. These three factors have significant impact on the performance of the thruster and have not been considered concurrently before. The model is verified by comparing the estimated specific impulse, impulse bit and thrust-to-power ratio with experimental measurements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional slug and snowplow models assume complete ionization of propellant gas and leads to an significant error in predicting the performance of PPTs. In fact, the conventional slug models produced an error up-to 70% in predicting the performance for LES-6 PPT [16]. Slug and snowplow models have been modified to give greater accuracy by accounting the effects of post-pulse macro particle production and gas-dynamic thrust developments [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional slug and snowplow models assume complete ionization of propellant gas and leads to an significant error in predicting the performance of PPTs. In fact, the conventional slug models produced an error up-to 70% in predicting the performance for LES-6 PPT [16]. Slug and snowplow models have been modified to give greater accuracy by accounting the effects of post-pulse macro particle production and gas-dynamic thrust developments [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional slug and snowplow models assume complete ionization of propellant gas and leads to an significant error in predicting the performance of PPTs. In fact the conventional slug models produce an error up-to 70% in predicting the performance for LES-6 PPT [16]. Slug and snowplow models 72 have been modified to give greater accuracy by accounting for effects of post-pulse macro particle production and gas-dynamic thrust developments [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%