2005
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226038278.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Discipline, Four Ways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I would be equally critical of the conventional distinction between French, British, American, and now German anthropology that has been re-launched in a recent book (Barth, Gingrich, Parkin, & Silverman 2005). It sets up the very kinds of boundaries and territories that many people would be very suspicious of, and misses the theoretical and analytical interchanges and forms of co-existence in so much anthropology.…”
Section: What Do You Mean By 'Metropolitanisation'?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…I would be equally critical of the conventional distinction between French, British, American, and now German anthropology that has been re-launched in a recent book (Barth, Gingrich, Parkin, & Silverman 2005). It sets up the very kinds of boundaries and territories that many people would be very suspicious of, and misses the theoretical and analytical interchanges and forms of co-existence in so much anthropology.…”
Section: What Do You Mean By 'Metropolitanisation'?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Too often it was the case that visiting researchers treated the local populations-in what the researchers considered "exotic places"as research objects, and too often they did not ask for proper permission to conduct research. This type of "othering" of Indigenous peoples and strangers in general (Barth et al 2005) has been heavily discussed and criticized in social and cultural anthropology from the 1980s onwards. I am referring here in particular to the critique of "culture," a concept that may separate the human society into distinct categories and groups of strangers (Abu-Lughod 1991).…”
Section: The Social Licenc E To Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier variant, Evans-Pritchard (1940) outlined the 'structural relativity' of many tribal group relations around a basic social organization of 'nested' group segmentation (Barth et al, 2005). By contrast, the new school of 'historical particularism' or cultural relativism that came to dominate US anthropology around 1900 emphasized the situated, fluid contextualization of each local and tribal group.…”
Section: Tribes In Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%