One goal, different strategies: an analysis of national broadband plans in Latin America

Abstract

Purpose-The ambitious government initiatives currently underway to accelerate broadband development indicate a major shift from the consensus that prevailed during the 1990 s in the telecommunications sector. To what extent does this change represent a return to the period before market liberalization and the privatization of government-run telecom services? What are the main objectives of national broadband plans and which policy tools are best suited to achieve them? This paper aims to analyze these questions through a comparative analysis of the goals, policy instruments and network-deployment models of the most relevant national broadband plans adopted in Latin America. Design/methodology/approach-The paper takes the form of a comparative analysis of the goals, policy instruments and network-deployment models of the most relevant national broadband plans adopted in Latin America. Findings-Common patterns and key differences between the initiatives adopted in five countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico) are identified and compared to those deployed in developed countries. Variations in the strategies adopted are linked to national differences in economic endowments and the broader processes of political change in Latin America. Originality/value-To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper making this comparative analysis.

WiFi4EU: Techno-economic analysis of a key European Commission initiative for public connectivity

“…According to Melody (2013), the regulatory instruments used have proved to be insufficient to facilitate the development of broadband infrastructures at an acceptable rate, and many countries are searching for alternative policy instruments (Falch, 2007). According to (Galperin, Mariscal, & Viecens, 2013) a similar trend can be observed in Latin America; moreover, there are states like South Korea, which show a clear preference for developmental model (Lemstra & Melody, 2014;Falch and Henten, 2010). Now, public support is seen not only as being responsible for the regulatory framework where market forces thrive, but also as the main force behind infrastructure deployment and innovative boosting measure (Feijoo Gonzalez, Gómez Barroso & Bohlin, 2011).…”

Broadband adoption in Latin American countries: does geographic proximity matter?

“…Katz and Callorda (2018) state that the regulatory framework and public policies represent critical enablers of the digital ecosystem development, such as spectrum management and tax incentives. Broadband plans in Latin American countries exhibit common patterns as well as differences (Galperín et al, 2013). The main policy tools in the telecommunications sector have been public financing and investment in networks and equipment; government participation in the networks' functioning, and an active industrial policy.…”

“…Proliferation of national broadband plan is an evidence of the implementation of those policies to promote telecommunications. Galperín et al (2013) argues that broadband initiatives in Latin America mainly centre on extending coverage and enhancing competition in the wholesale segment of the network. In technologically developing nations, a competitive telecommunications sector and higher investment in ICT lead to greater broadband diffusion (Gulati and Yates, 2012, p. 749).…”

“…In respect to ICT affordability, we should include both the prices of ICT services and the income level of users to reflect the financial constraint to pay on the demand side (World Bank, 2016;Galperín et al, 2013). Since mobile broadband tariffs are cheaper than fixed broadband's, mobile broadband has become more affordable.…”

Building the Next Information Superhighway: a Critical Analysis of China's Recent National Broadband Plan

“…Other plans, represented by the US and Europe, focus on policy to create a framework for private investment with a limited range of subsidies on the supply side (Ruhle, Brusic, Kittl, & Ehrler, 2011). In the context of developing countries, studies have found that governments across the globe have, to various degrees, returned to playing a proactive role to help speed up broadband development (Calandro & Moyo, 2012;Galperin, Mariscal, & Viecens, 2013;Jain, 2014;Jayakar & Liu, 2014a;Shin & Jung, 2012).…”