One left dorsolateral prefrontal cortical HF-rTMS session attenuates HPA-system sensitivity to critical feedback in healthy females

Baeken, Chris; Vanderhasselt, Marie‐Anne; Remue, Jonathan; Rossi, Valentina; Schiettecatte, Johan; Anckaert, Ellen; Raedt, Rudi De

doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.019

Cited by 50 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous studies have documented the role of prefrontal circuits in cognitive control (i.e., regulation) over stressful events (e.g., Baeken et al, 2014), as well as negative emotions (e.g., Leyman, De Raedt, Vanderhasselt & Baeken, 2011) and painful physical stimuli (e.g., Strigo, Simmons, Matthews, Craig & Paulus, 2008).…”

Section: Neurognitive Framework Regulation Expectationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of expectancy and proactive control in stress regulation: A neurocognitive framework for regulation expectation

Raedt

Hooley

2016

Clinical Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When confronted with stressful or emotionally arousing situations, regulatory abilities should allow us to adaptively cope. However, depressed individuals often have a low sense of perceived control and are characterized by a negative expectation bias regarding their ability to deal with future stressful events. Low expectancy concerning the ability to deal with future stressful events may result in less initiation of proactive control, a crucial mechanism of cognitive control reflecting sustained and anticipatory maintenance of goal-relevant information in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to optimize cognitive performance. In this theoretical review we integrate a diverse body of literature. We argue that the expectancy of an individual's regulatory abilities prior to the presentation of an arousing event or stressful task will be related to anticipation and proactive up-or down regulation of specific neurocircuits before the actual encounter with the stressful event occurs, in a manner that can be either adaptive or maladaptive. Moreover, we discuss the important role of self-esteem as well as the ability to accept the situation when coping is not possible. Our approach has implications for a broad range of disorders and conditions in which stress regulation plays a role, and can be used to guide the use of recently developed clinical interventions, as well as to fine-tune interventions to facilitate proactive control. Cortex, stress regulation, anticipation, depression, proactive control, coping, self-esteem, When we are confronted with situations or thoughts perceived as unpleasant, aversive or threatening, a series of biological and psychological processes is activated, generating a coordinated response. This so-called stress response is triggered when an individual's well-being or health is threatened. Relational or financial problems, unpredictability, an acute threat, or a challenging situation such as a job interview are examples of stressful situations or stressors that can initiate a stress response. Regulatory abilities, which we call stress regulation, generally allow us to cope with these situations in an adaptive way. However, there are large individual differences in how well people handle life stressors. Indeed, problems with stress regulation are thought to play a central role in the development and clinical course of depression (Hooley, Orley & Teasdale, 1986;Hankin, 2008;Morris, Ciesla & Garber, 2010). It has also been suggested that, over time, depressive episodes can be triggered by progressively milder and milder stressors (Monroe & Harkness, 2005; but see also Anderson et al., 2016). Keywords: Dorsolateral PrefrontalResearch shows the important role of stress regulation in the development of different forms of psychopathology, such as depression, where psychosocial stressors are strongly implicated in the triggering of new episodes (Kendler et al., 2000).Understanding the role of stressors in depression requires consideration of the interaction between biological, cognitive ...

show abstract

Section: Neurognitive Framework Regulation Expectationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of expectancy and proactive control in stress regulation: A neurocognitive framework for regulation expectation

Raedt

Hooley

2016

Clinical Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In healthy samples, early studies found an increase in negative mood after stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex (George et al , 1996; Pascual-Leone et al , 1996; Dearing Martin et al , 1997), while more recent studies did not detect any changes in mood as a result of the stimulation itself (Mosimann et al , 2000; Grisaru et al , 2001; Padberg et al , 2001; Baeken et al , 2006, 2008; Baeken et al , 2014; Moulier et al , 2016). Schaller et al (2011) demonstrated that several sessions of HF rTMS attenuated only depression ratings of healthy individuals as assessed with the Becks Depression Inventory, while subjective mood ratings remained stable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In light of these findings, it is conceivable that HF rTMS over the left DLPFC has protective effects against a subsequent negative event. Indeed, recent studies have found that HF rTMS over the left DLPFC prior to a stress-inducing task attenuates subsequent decreases in heart rate variability (Remue et al , 2015) and stress hormonal responses (Baeken et al , 2014), as compared to stimulation over the right DLPFC and/or sham stimulation. Based on these considerations, the present study aims at investigating the effects of rTMS stimulation over the left DLPFC on affective responses to a negative mood induction and on attentional processing, which are both of direct relevance to emotion regulation in depression.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the impact of a negative mood induction

Möbius

Lacomblé

Meyer

et al. 2016

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been found to alleviate depressive symptoms. However, the mechanisms driving these effects are still poorly understood. In the current study, we tested the idea that this intervention protects against negative mood shifts following emotional provocation. We furthermore explored changes in EEG activity (frontal alpha asymmetry) and effects on attentional processing (emotional Stroop). To this end, 23 healthy individuals participated in two sessions separated by one week, whereby they once received 15 min of 10Hz rTMS stimulation (1500 pulses) at 110% of the individual motor threshold, and once sham stimulation. Then, negative mood was induced using sad movie clips. The results revealed a significantly stronger mood decline following rTMS compared to sham stimulation. No changes were observed in frontal alpha asymmetry and attentional processing. Our findings are at odds with the view that high frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC directly protects against the induction of negative mood, but rather suggest that it enhances the effects of emotional provocation. Possibly, in healthy young individuals, this stimulation protocol heightens susceptibility to mood induction procedures in general.

show abstract

“…There are other mechanisms that might mediate the effect of rTMS and are probably independent of synaptic plasticity. For instance, rTMS has been shown to act on the neuroendocrine system by decreasing corticosteroid levels in rats and humans . Other effects include the prevention of neuronal death, as demonstrated by applying low‐intensity magnetic stimulation in cultures of cortical neurons, and increased expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes .…”

Section: Why Rtms Might Be Used As a Therapeutic Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for movement disorders: A critical review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A BS TRACT: Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a safe and painless non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has been largely used in the past 30 years to explore cortical function in healthy participants and, inter alia, the pathophysiology of movement disorders. During the years, its use has evolved from primarily research purposes to treatment of a large variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases. In this article, we illustrate the basic principles on which the therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation is based and review the clinical trials that have been performed in patients with movement disorders.

show abstract

One left dorsolateral prefrontal cortical HF-rTMS session attenuates HPA-system sensitivity to critical feedback in healthy females

Cited by 50 publications

References 71 publications

The role of expectancy and proactive control in stress regulation: A neurocognitive framework for regulation expectation

The role of expectancy and proactive control in stress regulation: A neurocognitive framework for regulation expectation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the impact of a negative mood induction

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for movement disorders: A critical review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About