2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-016-0420-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-pot synthesis of graphene oxide and Ni-Al layered double hydroxides nanocomposites for the efficient removal of U(VI) from wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the porous template covering the surface of GO can be observed clearly by TEM after filtering and before burning, and the pore size of porous template depends on the concentration of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O (Figure a). As can be seen from Figure b, the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 10.8° and 21.6° exhibit the (003) and (006) crystal planes of Zn layered double hydroxide (LDH), confirming that the Zn LDH layer is the porous template covering the surface of GO. Moreover, with an increase in concentration of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O addition, the peak intensity of the (003) and (006) crystal planes first increases and then decreases, the similar results are found into NO 3 − peak intensity in FT‐IR (≈1400 cm −1 , Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Moreover, the porous template covering the surface of GO can be observed clearly by TEM after filtering and before burning, and the pore size of porous template depends on the concentration of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O (Figure a). As can be seen from Figure b, the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 10.8° and 21.6° exhibit the (003) and (006) crystal planes of Zn layered double hydroxide (LDH), confirming that the Zn LDH layer is the porous template covering the surface of GO. Moreover, with an increase in concentration of Zn(NO 3 ) 2 ·6H 2 O addition, the peak intensity of the (003) and (006) crystal planes first increases and then decreases, the similar results are found into NO 3 − peak intensity in FT‐IR (≈1400 cm −1 , Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The adsorbent surface is positively charged below pH zpc and negatively charged above the pH zpc. , Therefore, the maximum removal of fluoride for 100 mg L −1 fluoride occurred at pH 5.0 owing to the protonated adsorbent surface and above this pH the percentage removal decreases due to the repulsive interaction between fluoride and negatively charged adsorbent surface. At low levels of fluoride − , the observed pH range was 3.0‐7.0 for effective defluoridation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, once U VI ,E u III ,S r II ,T h III ,a nd other radionuclides have entered the environment, their toxicity,r adioactivity,c arcinogenesis, and mutagenesis cause irreversible damage. [70,74,75] The low cost, facile synthesis processes, and high removal capacities of G@LDH materials give them great potentiala ss orbents fort he decontamination of radionuclides in practical applications. Yu et al synthesized nanocomposites of GO and NiAl-LDH (GO@LDH) by using the urea hydrothermal method.…”
Section: Removal Of Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al synthesized nanocomposites of GO and NiAl-LDH (GO@LDH) by using the urea hydrothermal method. [70] The U VIelimination behavior of GO@LDHw as investigated under various conditions. The maximum removal was 159.7 mg g À1 , which was highert han those of GO (92.0 mg g À1 )a nd pure NiAl-LDH (69.0 mg g À1 )a lone.…”
Section: Removal Of Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation