One‐stage full‐mouth disinfection combined with a periodontal dressing: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum; Coucke, Wim; Quirynen, Marc

doi:10.1111/jcpe.12199

Cited by 3 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Keestra et al . evaluated the effects of adding the use of a periodontal dressing (Coe-Pak ® type) to the FMD protocol [ 24 ]. This approach resulted in a greater reduction in shallow and moderate-depth periodontal pockets.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, only deep pockets showed a tendency for improvement. According to the authors, this technique would provide additional short-term clinical benefit and would reduce postoperative pain [ 24 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since 1995, several modifications have been suggested to improve the effectiveness of FMD. These modifications include full-mouth treatment without CHX [ 6 - 9 ], the extension of hygiene methods and an increase in the duration of posttreatment CHX use [ 5 ], the replacement of CHX with other antiseptics [ 10 - 13 ], the addition of antibiotics [ 14 - 22 ] or probiotics [ 21 ], the use of photodynamic therapy [ 23 ], and the use of a periodontal dressing [ 24 ]. FMD without CHX reduced the outcomes of the clinical results, suggesting an important but prudently selected use for the protocol [ 7 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Twenty Years of Full-Mouth Disinfection: The Past, the Present and the Future

Pockpa¹,

Soueidan²,

Louis³

et al. 2018

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Conventional periodontal treatment, performed quadrant by quadrant in multiple visits, was re-evaluated in the early 1990s when the full-mouth disinfection concept was introduced. Over the years, several modifications to the full-mouth disinfection approach have been suggested.Objective:The purpose of this article is to review the evolution of full-mouth disinfection during the past 20 years, to specify its indications and to consider the prospects for this approach.Materials and Methods:An electronic and manual search of the literature, ending in December 2016, was performed by two independent researchers. Only pivotal studies and randomized controlled clinical trials published in the English language that evaluated a new approach to full-mouth disinfection were selected.Results:According to the studies included in our analysis (21 articles), several modified full-mouth disinfection protocols have been designed including: full-mouth treatment without chlorhexidine, the extension of hygiene methods and an increase in the duration of post-treatment chlorhexidine use, the replacement of chlorhexidine with other antiseptics, supplementation with antibiotics or probiotics, full-mouth antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and one-stage full-mouth disinfection combined with a periodontal dressing.Conclusion:Since 1995, several modifications have been suggested to improve the effectiveness of full-mouth disinfection. The majority of the studies demonstrate that the results obtained with full-mouth disinfection and its variants are equivalent to each other and to those obtained with the conventional quadrant method. Currently, the selection of this technique remains empirical and depends on the preferences of the practitioner and the patient. In the future, a patient-centered approach should be the best indication for the use of this technique.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Twenty Years of Full-Mouth Disinfection: The Past, the Present and the Future

Pockpa¹,

Soueidan²,

Louis³

et al. 2018

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similar research design was performed by Keestra et al . but in this study, the aim was to investigate up to 3 months the effectiveness of periodontal dressing removed 7 days after one‐stage‐full‐mouth disinfection as described by Quirynen et al . The periodontal dressing group showed a significant ( P < 0.05) additional reduction of PD and gain of CAL for the moderate pockets of single‐ and multirooted teeth compared to non‐dressing treated control group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scaling and root planing represents the most common and widely accepted procedure for the treatment of periodontitis (31). Recently, the use of dressing has been advocated to enhance non-surgical periodontal treatment outcomes due a significant reduction of PD and gain of CAL (15,16,24). Nevertheless, these findings must be carefully interpreted because such results must not be solely addressed by the application of the periodontal dressing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of periodontal dressing on non‐surgical periodontal treatment outcomes: a systematic review

Monje

Kramp²,

Amo

et al. 2015

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of periodontal dressing on the clinical outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatments; A randomized controlled trial.

Hameed

Malik

Shaukat

et al. 2023

TPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To study the effectiveness of periodontal dressing on different clinical periodontal parameters after scaling and root planning. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Periodontology, Multan Medical & Dental College, Multan. Period: May to July 2020. Material & Methods: Thirty three patients of both genders between ages 30-60 were included. Five clinical parameters were measured at baseline. These variables were recorded by University Of Michigan “O’’ Probe with William’s Markings. The measurements were executed by a single, trained and calibrated examiner. Right and left quadrants of Maxilla and Mandible of the same patient were selected as the test and control sites respectively through random selection by lottery method. The maxillary and mandibular test sides were covered with periodontal dressing for 07 days, later the dressing was detached. After 12 weeks, all clinical parameters were recorded again by the same examiner. Results: Mean age was found to be 45.28 years in males and 41.27 years in females. The mean Kappa value of intra-examiner reliability was identified as 0.95. In comparison to control group, test group showed a highly significant improvement in all five tested periodontal variables when the values were compared at base line and then after 12 weeks. Conclusion: Periodontal dressing has significantly improved the clinical outcomes and the periodontal parameters after Scaling and Root Planning procedures.

show abstract

One‐stage full‐mouth disinfection combined with a periodontal dressing: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract: The use of a periodontal dressing for 7 days after a OSFMD offers an additional short-term clinical improvement and lowers the pain intensity.

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

Twenty Years of Full-Mouth Disinfection: The Past, the Present and the Future

Twenty Years of Full-Mouth Disinfection: The Past, the Present and the Future

Effect of periodontal dressing on non‐surgical periodontal treatment outcomes: a systematic review

Effect of periodontal dressing on the clinical outcomes of non-surgical periodontal treatments; A randomized controlled trial.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About