2012
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Stage Reconstruction of Skull Exposed by Burn Injury Using a Tissue Expansion Technique

Abstract: BackgroundAn area of the skull exposed by burn injury has been covered by various methods including local flap, skin graft, or free flap surgery. Each method has disadvantages, such as postoperative alopecia or donor site morbidities. Due to the risk of osteomyelitis in the injured skull during the expansion period, tissue expansion was excluded from primary reconstruction. However, successful primary reconstruction was possible in burned skull by tissue expansion.MethodsFrom January 2000 to 2011, tissue expan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research should be conducted to prevent perioperative and postoperative infection because internal distractors are placed in vulnerable locations deep within vital structures of the cranium. 30 The distraction rate of this study was higher than is typical at 2 mm/day. As previously described, BMP-2 could shorten the distraction period, 16 and in preliminary studies, we experienced similar results using TDO with rhBMP-2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Further research should be conducted to prevent perioperative and postoperative infection because internal distractors are placed in vulnerable locations deep within vital structures of the cranium. 30 The distraction rate of this study was higher than is typical at 2 mm/day. As previously described, BMP-2 could shorten the distraction period, 16 and in preliminary studies, we experienced similar results using TDO with rhBMP-2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Local flaps [ 11 ] (rotation, advancement, and transposition flaps) can be useful for reconstruction of small defect size; to create flaps, redundant tissue surrounding the wound is required; the scalp usually does not have significant redundant tissue to harvest local flaps. Sometimes tissue expansion can be useful for reconstruction using local flap but the discomfort for the patient is very high and this technique cannot be dedicated to elderly patients [ 12 , 13 ]. In general for large defects of the scalp random pattern flaps [ 14 , 15 ] have limited applications and locoregional or free flaps are preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical coverage of a large scalp defect by local flap is challenging because of the inelasticity of scalp and forehead tissue [ 1 2 ]. Several types of free flaps have been used for scalp reconstruction, such as latissimus dorsi (LD), anterolateral thigh (ALT), radial forearm, rectus abdominis, or omental flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, LD or ALT flaps are preferred secondary to the large surface area and long vascular pedicle [ 3 4 ]. However, free tissue transfers require microvascular expertise and are associated with the possibility of postoperative muscle atrophy and contracture as well as the attend and risk of donor site morbidity or abnormality [ 2 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%