2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year clinical outcome after abciximab bolus-only compared with abciximab bolus and 12-hour infusion in the Randomized EArly Discharge after Transradial Stenting of CoronarY Arteries (EASY) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While OPD TRI has been shown to be feasible and safe in Western studies, [5][6][7][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] the situation in Asia is unclear. The present prospective nonrandomized comparison study involving acceptably large numbers of patients provides an indication that, by careful selection criteria, same-day discharge after OPD TRIs is acceptable and without serious PCI related complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While OPD TRI has been shown to be feasible and safe in Western studies, [5][6][7][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] the situation in Asia is unclear. The present prospective nonrandomized comparison study involving acceptably large numbers of patients provides an indication that, by careful selection criteria, same-day discharge after OPD TRIs is acceptable and without serious PCI related complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Accordingly, TRI has been increasingly adopted for out-patient department (OPD) procedures, with same-day discharge, with a variety of studies including randomized trials verifying the safety and feasibility of the approach in Western countries. [5][6][7][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Beginning in 1994, we and others introduced TRI in Asia. [8][9][10] However, feasibility and safety issues of OPD TRI without admission have not been reported in Asia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, what defines “carefully selected” elective PCI patients has been inconsistently applied, if defined at all 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Some studies have cautiously explored the feasibility of SDD beyond the low‐risk population,7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 but they were evaluated in selected patients or required protocols or checklists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in radial access has the potential to decrease the incidence of local vascular access complications and potentially shorten duration of hospital stay, while still actively involving the patients in the decision process. 1,5,6 Since completion of the study, this vascular access has been successfully implemented into practice in this tertiary cardiac care center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial approach may also be associated with earlier discharge compared with vascular access through the femoral artery. 5,6 Currently, usual care regarding vascular access options before CA procedures involves a brief discussion between the patient and the cardiologist performing the procedure; however, in general terms, usual care involved in the decision-making process for healthcare options has 3 key problems: (1) physicians are poor judges of patients' values; (2) the decision quality from standard counseling between physician and patient has been demonstrated to be inadequate; and (3) patients have unrealistic expectations of potential treatment benefits and harms. 7 Given the difficulties surrounding the decision-making process in preference-sensitive healthcare options, the concept of shared decision-making and, more specifically, the use of patient decision aids (PtDA) to supplement physicianpatient counseling have been developed, evaluated, and implemented.…”
Section: Editorial See P 247mentioning
confidence: 99%