2011
DOI: 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Year Follow-Up of Collaborative Depression Care for Low-Income, Predominantly Hispanic Patients With Cancer

Abstract: Collaborative care reduced depression symptoms and enhanced quality of life; however, results call for ongoing depression symptom monitoring and treatment for low-income cancer survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28,29 Only two trials targeted emotional well-being, both demonstrating efficacy in Hispanic populations. [30][31][32] There remains a need to evaluate interventions outside the Hispanic population to reduce depression and improve QOL in immigrants with cancer.…”
Section: Immigrant-specific Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28,29 Only two trials targeted emotional well-being, both demonstrating efficacy in Hispanic populations. [30][31][32] There remains a need to evaluate interventions outside the Hispanic population to reduce depression and improve QOL in immigrants with cancer.…”
Section: Immigrant-specific Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, collaborative models of care for depression in oncology settings, including a large cancer center in the United Kingdom and a cancer center serving low-income, predominantly Hispanic cancer patients in the United States, have been shown to be effective. Collaborative care models in these settings included a depression care manager with supervision from a psychiatrist, who provided problem-solving therapy, antidepressant treatment, symptom monitoring, and relapse prevention, and were associated with significant reduction in depression symptoms and enhancement in quality of life compared with usual care [36,37]. Further research is needed to examine the impact and costeffectiveness of these types of collaborative psychosocial care models of joint care among physicians, nurses, and psycho-oncology teams.…”
Section: Psychosocial Health Service Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence for a significantly beneficial effect of collaborative care interventions on depression outcomes at the end of treatment with moderate effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (SMD range: À0.46 to À0.74, n ¼ 5) and clinically meaningful treatment responses (OR range: 1.29-4.75, n ¼ 6). Long-term follow-up data on collaborative care treatment in cancer patients with depression suggests that these positive effects on depression outcomes can be sustained [30]. Evidence on depression remission (n ¼ 2) and depression-free days (n ¼ 1) is sparse and conclusions cannot be drawn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%