2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year operational modal analysis of a steel bridge from high-resolution macrostrain monitoring: Influence of temperature vs. retrofitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a second independent vibration monitoring system consisting of 80 fiber Bragg grating (FBG) strain measurements is present on the railway bridge [17]. The monitoring covers a shorter time period.…”
Section: Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a second independent vibration monitoring system consisting of 80 fiber Bragg grating (FBG) strain measurements is present on the railway bridge [17]. The monitoring covers a shorter time period.…”
Section: Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng and Hoon Kim 20 tested a self‐adaptive clustering approach with a weighted multi‐term distance on the Z24 and Downing Hall benchmarks. The classic hierarchical clustering‐based AOMA was applied by Anastasopoulos et al 21 to almost one year of acquisitions from a steel single‐span tied arch railway bridge. Indeed, the Structural Mechanics Section of KU Leuven developed a MatLab® Toolbox, 22 which, similarly to the algorithm applied here for this study, includes (among some other options) an SSI algorithm 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider part of a railway bridge. SHM for such a structure is usually based on vibration or strain measurements where anomalies are detected by spotting variations in engineered features such as the modal parameters [2]. This work aims to build an anomaly detector that is not based on engineered features, but rather on signal patterns directly found in the strain gauge measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%