2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One year oral Toxicity of D-004, a lipid extract from Roystonea regia fruits, in Sprague Dawley rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with earlier experimental toxicological [38][39][40] and clinical [28] data, D-004 was well tolerated and did not produce significant changes in any of the variables studied (including PSA) compared with placebo. Only one paticipant, who voluntarily discontinued the trial, reported an adverse effect (dyspepsia) during the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Consistent with earlier experimental toxicological [38][39][40] and clinical [28] data, D-004 was well tolerated and did not produce significant changes in any of the variables studied (including PSA) compared with placebo. Only one paticipant, who voluntarily discontinued the trial, reported an adverse effect (dyspepsia) during the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…32 Hematocrit and RBC counts in females treated with 1000 mg/kg/d were significantly higher than in the control group, but such significance is not biologically meaningful, since both indicators increased rather than decreased, and all individual values were within normal limits, as reported by other groups 46 and by us. 32 The use of moderate dietary restriction (DR) results in a better controlled rodent model with a lower incidence or delayed onset of spontaneous diseases and tumors. ( Operationally simple, moderate DR significantly improves survival, controls adult body weight, and obesity, reduces agerelated renal, endocrine, and cardiac diseases, increases exposure time, and increases the statistical sensitivity of these expensive, chronic bioassays to detect a true treatment effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…[30][31][32] In particular, long-term (12 months) oral treatment with D-004 (800-2000 mg/kg/d) did not show evidence of D-004-related toxicity in rats, and the highest dose (2000 mg/kg/d) was a no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL). 32 Genotoxicity studies (Ames test, comet assay, bone marrow micronucleus, Test Substance D-004, obtained from Centre of Natural Products (National Centre for Scientific Research, Havana, Cuba), was used and met control quality specifications. D-004 was obtained through the saponification of royal palm fruits and further extraction and purification in organic solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This hypothesis is supported by the fact that no abnormal findings were observed in relation to the administration of the test substance in the remaining rats in the same dose group. We demonstrated that the test substance could be used as a food supplement, because some famous food ingredients were toxic at high doses, (e.g., lemongrass ( Cymbopogon citratus ) essential oil, Roystonea regia fruit, and α -glycerylphosphorylcholine (AGPC)) [ 31 33 ]. The results of the serum biochemical examinations of the rat sera revealed reductions in the levels of AST and ALT in the male groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%