2022
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2021.3091188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online and Predictive Warning System for Forced Lane Changes Using Risk Maps

Abstract: The survival analysis of driving trajectories allows for holistic evaluations of car-related risks caused by collisions or curvy roads. This analysis has advantages over common Time-To-X indicators, such as its predictive and probabilistic nature. However, so far, the theoretical risks have not been demonstrated in real-world environments. In this paper, we therefore present Risk Maps (RM) for online warning support in situations with forced lane changes, due to the end of roads.For this purpose, we first unif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We add the driver errors in Risk Maps by also inputting the interface variables o per , v per , and p per from the last section. This is the main difference to the original Risk Maps behavior planner which was presented in [12]. On the bottom, Fig.…”
Section: B Influence On Risk Mapsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We add the driver errors in Risk Maps by also inputting the interface variables o per , v per , and p per from the last section. This is the main difference to the original Risk Maps behavior planner which was presented in [12]. On the bottom, Fig.…”
Section: B Influence On Risk Mapsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 The risk model used for the perceived Risk Maps and the objective Risk Maps includes a Gaussian model that models 2D Gaussian distributions around the positions of the vehicles and estimates the collision risk between vehicles by taking the overlap of the Gaussians. For a description of the complete risk model, please refer to the work [12]. Fig.…”
Section: A Evaluating Driver Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%