Online influence, offline violence: language use on YouTube surrounding the ‘Unite the Right’ rally

Abstract

The media frequently describes the 2017 Charlottesville ‘Unite the Right’ rally as a turning point for the alt-right and white supremacist movements. Social movement theory suggests that the media attention and public discourse concerning the rally may have engendered changes in social identity performance and visibility of the alt-right, but this has yet to be empirically tested. The presence of the movement on YouTube is of particular interest, as this platform has been referred to as a breeding ground for the alt-right. The current study investigates whether there are differences in language use between 7142 alt-right and progressive YouTube channels, in addition to measuring possible changes as a result of the rally. To do so, we create structural topic models and measure bigram proportions in video transcripts, spanning approximately 2 months before and after the rally. We observe differences in topics between the two groups, with the ‘alternative influencers’, for example, discussing topics related to race and free speech to a larger extent than progressive channels. We also observe structural breakpoints in the use of bigrams at the time of the rally, suggesting there are changes in language use within the two groups as a result of the rally. While most changes relate to mentions of the rally itself, the alternative group also shows an increase in promotion of their YouTube channels. In light of social movement theory, we argue that language use on YouTube shows that the Charlottesville rally indeed triggered changes in social identity performance and visibility of the alt-right.

Analyzing user-generated content using natural language processing: a case study of public satisfaction with healthcare systems

“…Both methods are extensively used in the studies based on computational approach (e.g. [24,39,40]). The first method, word frequency analysis, as its name suggests, involves identifying most frequently used terms in the body of user comments.…”

Hidden order across online extremist movements can be disrupted by nudging collective chemistry

“…3.1. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ different in their ideology, origins, and goals, so a comprehensive description of them requires both a quantitative and a qualitative discussion. The sociological reasons for why and how social movements grow, offline and online, can likely be explained in part by individual-level factors, such as poverty and personality traits, as well as movement-level factors such as ideology, culture, and political aims [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . Yet system-level factors are also crucial, and recent work suggests that these play important roles in the development and countering of online extremism 22,28,29 .…”

“…Youngblood recently provided an analysis of 416 far-right extremists exposed in the United States between 2005 and 2017, discussing how social media usage and group membership enhance the spread of extremist ideology and concluding that online and physical organizing remain primary recruitment tools 9 . Online extremism and its recruitment activities pose a significant threat that could lead to real world terror threats [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and hence needs to be understood and mitigated 10-29 -regardless of whether the underlying movements are far-right, farleft, or occupy some other place in the political space.Social media platforms are struggling to contain the growth of online extremist movements. Platforms often adopt a combination of content moderation and actively providing (or promoting users who provide) countermessaging 23 .…”

Political Influencers on YouTube: Business Strategies and Content Characteristics

“…This development refers to an increasing share of morally charged, one-sided content on political issues, which thereby fosters misinformation spreading, often in conjunction with right-wing extremism (Munger & Phillips, 2020;Rauchfleisch & Kaiser, 2020) and expressions of distrust in mainstream news media (Figenschou & Ihlebaek, 2019;Lewis, 2020). As this development can have serious implications for democratic societies along the lines of public misperception and audience polarisation, there is an increasing number of studies investigating YouTube content in this regard (e.g., Finlayson, 2020;Van der Vegt et al, 2021). Although these studies provide valuable insights into socio-political debates, previous research has mainly focused on specific topics or cases.…”