2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0167-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online MapReduce processing on two identical parallel machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the small-scale instances, it can be seen that when the range of the processing time of operations is enlarged from (1,5) to (1,10), the running time of CPLEX increases significantly. While the running time of the genetic algorithm, the simulated annealing algorithm, and L-F algorithm does not change significantly.…”
Section: Small-scale Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the small-scale instances, it can be seen that when the range of the processing time of operations is enlarged from (1,5) to (1,10), the running time of CPLEX increases significantly. While the running time of the genetic algorithm, the simulated annealing algorithm, and L-F algorithm does not change significantly.…”
Section: Small-scale Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare L-F algorithm with the genetic algorithm and the simulated annealing algorithm to verify its performance. e studies of MapReduce scheduling problem often assume that all the jobs are processed on identical parallel machines [4,5]. First, in the case of online study based on this assumption, [6] considers a two-stage classical flexible flow shop problem based on MapReduce system, and give an online 6-approximation and an online (1 + ϵ)-speed O (1/ϵ 4 )competitive algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%