2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online monitoring of biofilm growth and activity using a combined multi-channel impedimetric and amperometric sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both impedance and microscopy images conveyed the same results and were in good agreement with the timings and relative changes published in the literature [49]. The novel four-electrode based measurements confirmed an improvement in detecting biofilm formation compared to the two-electrode technique as shown by the 5% increased sensitivity, in part because the effect of the electrode-electrolyte was excluded from the measurement and the IDuE was optimized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Both impedance and microscopy images conveyed the same results and were in good agreement with the timings and relative changes published in the literature [49]. The novel four-electrode based measurements confirmed an improvement in detecting biofilm formation compared to the two-electrode technique as shown by the 5% increased sensitivity, in part because the effect of the electrode-electrolyte was excluded from the measurement and the IDuE was optimized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Of all the different detection technologies to track biofouling, actuators that are either acoustic [21], optical [22] or electromagnetic [23] in nature are most reliable and most sensitive [10,24]. A drawback of all these devices is however that the actual detector required is rather expensive whether that is e.g., an optical sensor [25], an analyser for scattering (S) parameters [18] or an impedance analyser [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the precise measurement of bacterial adhesion to surfaces are difficult and time consuming because bacterial cells typically occur on the micrometerscale and their adhesion forces are generally low typically 0.1-100 nN [8]. Recent studies on the detection of bacteria on surfaces have focused on imaging systems such as optical [9] and fluorescent microscopy [10] to image the bacteria themselves or luminescence measurement of the presence of cells by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) detection systems [11]. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensors [12], Nucleic Acid Detection [13], Optical Waveguide Lightmode Spectroscopy [14], Optical Leaky Waveguide Sensors [15], and Evanescent Mode Fiber Optic Sensors [16] have also been applied in order to detect biochemical toxins as signatures of bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%