Online peer mentorship programmes for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities: A systematic review

Abstract

Background: Children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities may be less well integrated into their community than their peers. Online groups can be particularly accessible for individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities, as individuals may be able to connect with a larger network than they would in their local community. This systematic review aimed at estimating the effectiveness of online peer mentorship programmes on children and adolescent's participation in life situations.Methods: A systematic review was conducted to search Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Education Research Complete (ERIC) electronic databases. Thematic analysis was done for studies that used qualitative methodology.Results: Eleven articles were included, and they examined the influences of five different structured online peer mentorship intervention programmes and six different online support groups. The disabilities included cerebral palsy (n = 3), autism spectrum disorder (n = 3), spina bifida (n = 2), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 2), and other neurodevelopmental disorders. The mentors included in the studies were caregivers of children with disabilities, youth and adults with disabilities, and a virtual peer actor. The mentees included in the studies were youth with disabilities (age 10-19 years) and their families. Intervention characteristics varied across the studies but consistently showed a unique potential to facilitate social networking and support. Intervention programmes with specific content and structure showed better participation outcomes than unstructured interventions. Presence of a moderator and participant characteristics (age and sociocultural background) was suggested to influence the outcomes of interventions.Conclusions: Online peer mentorship programmes appear to have positive influence on social engagement and participation in life situation for children and adolescents with disabilities. This paper discusses several areas that should be considered in future research studies to improve potential effectiveness and use of study designs that help to establish not only if interventions work but also for whom they work best and why.

Supporting Students with Neurodevelopment Disorders in School Health Care—School Nurses’ Experiences

“…There is a need to identify and address social skills, positive emotions and positive affect, and emotional regulation for individuals who have ASD as early as possible [ 3 ]. Structured online peer mentorship programs help to improve social engagement and participation in life situations of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities [ 20 ].…”

Nurturing the Positive Mental Health of Autistic Children, Adolescents and Adults alongside That of Their Family Care-Givers: A Review of Reviews

“…According to a recent review [44], autistic people's perspectives are essential to success in planning interventions for individuals, but this ethos must be extended to wider service planning and its implementation, most notably as trainers of staff who may be working in different tiers of service and devising their job specification. This may lead to advocates acting as peer mentors [45] or obtaining paid employment within newly created services. In a sense, there is no shortage of trainers when there are people with autism and their families available to take on this role.…”

Snehagram Model of an Applied Psychosocial Intervention Approach Among Adolescents Living with HIV/AIDS: A Blueprint

“…However, identification of the resources/opportunities available postulate that the teaching component can be wholly delivered through synchronous and asynchronous learning (Ni, 2013;Taddei, 2020), via pre-recorded videos, online classes or any other means that the situation permits. Similarly, the psychological intervention component needs adaptation, with individual and group counselling sessions being delivered through video-conferencing technology and life skills via recorded sessions of facilitated strategies and activities that build psychosocial resources (Saxena et al, 2019;Zeren et al, 2020). Finally, it is important to note that the SL component remains unchanged, as students and trainee professionals will similarly glean valuable learning outcomes from the adaptation of service delivery and digital upskilling (Ali et al, 2020), which are necessary skills needed to be an effective field practitioner.…”