2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4276-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Technology in Knowledge Transfer

Abstract: The transfer of knowledge entails a challenge for any research activity. It drives the promise and results towards implemented and replicable facts. The transfer is frequently crystallised in contracts and patents, but not solely: scientific communication, general publication, property rights, or public R&D + innovation projects generated in the heat of research are also transference products and tools. This article lays out the benefits and weaknesses of these devices, underlining the participation of tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This combination of pillars was modelled into what is now called Open Science, which mainly works with STE(A)M subjects [9]. Burgos [10] also supports this idea by a set of contributions focused on the implementation of Open Science, starting with the integration of all the basic pillars in the process. Further, the main question to address is how Open Science can contribute to complement official, accredited competences in STE(A)M in an effective way [11].…”
Section: Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This combination of pillars was modelled into what is now called Open Science, which mainly works with STE(A)M subjects [9]. Burgos [10] also supports this idea by a set of contributions focused on the implementation of Open Science, starting with the integration of all the basic pillars in the process. Further, the main question to address is how Open Science can contribute to complement official, accredited competences in STE(A)M in an effective way [11].…”
Section: Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Open Science is based in access, technology, content and other already cited pillars [7]. Burgos [27] also presented the OUF coding to name Open, Universal and Free resources, so they can be properly labelled and used in the context of Open Science and Open Education. They all might work together despite a) the official accreditation of the programmes, b) the basic building block (e.g., ECTS or hour) and c) the way to interpret the competence transfer from the academic world to the labour market [28,29].…”
Section: Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic that arises in the design of the MOOC invites us to visualize, from open and collaborative innovation, new proposals that promote the social construction of learning with resources, materials, and technology that lead to successful training production. (Burgos, 2020). This team of eight experts consisted of four professor experts in content, a graphic designer, two educational innovation professors, and an instructional designer.…”
Section: Open and Collaborative Innovation In The Design Of Moocs And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open innovation is the new paradigm of innovation. Since the beginning of 2000, it has signified the free transfer of knowledge among different individuals such as universities, companies, and governments (Burgos, 2020). This is where MOOCs come to constitute opportunities to promote learning experiences (Wu & Luo, 2022) throughout life, following the fourth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) (Gómez-Llanos & Durán-Barroso, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Fundamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are so many resources, services, and approaches to complement, enhance, and move science and education forward at present: open science, , microcomputer based laboratory, open educational resources, , MOOCs, ,, virtual reality, augmented reality, , emotional intelligence, , personalized learning environments, , serious games, analytics, blockchain, virtual laboratories, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%