2018 IEEE 28th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/mlsp.2018.8517019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Variational Message Passing in the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since exact inference is not possible, these studies have relied on different approximate inference approaches, such as sampling, Taylor approximation, variational inference or message-passing algorithms. Our approach for treatment of binary observations using moment matching is similar to the message-passing approach taken recently for studying dynamical systems [46,47]. We chose this approach rather than the Taylor approximation used previously [18] because it has been shown that methods based on moment matching perform better than derivative-based methods in approximating exact inference for binary Gaussian process models [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since exact inference is not possible, these studies have relied on different approximate inference approaches, such as sampling, Taylor approximation, variational inference or message-passing algorithms. Our approach for treatment of binary observations using moment matching is similar to the message-passing approach taken recently for studying dynamical systems [46,47]. We chose this approach rather than the Taylor approximation used previously [18] because it has been shown that methods based on moment matching perform better than derivative-based methods in approximating exact inference for binary Gaussian process models [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aproach scales in principle to more complex applications that may be of interest to industry as well. For example, the state space models in the examples can be readily extended to hierarchical generative models (Kiebel et al, 2009 ; Senoz and de Vries, 2018 ), which have been shown to be quite powerful in modeling real-world dynamics (e.g., Turner and Sahani, 2008 ; Mathys et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the previous example, the exact Bayesian inference for this type of model is not tractable. Moreover, the variational message update rules (9) are not tractable either, as the HGF model contains nonconjugate relationships among variables in the form of the link function f. However, inference in this model is still possible with the custom message update rules approximation [43]. Te ReactiveMP.jl package supports a straightforward API to add custom nodes with custom message passing update rules.…”
Section: Hierarchical Gaussianmentioning
confidence: 99%