2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic variation in site fidelity and homing behaviour of a temperate reef fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also shown that site fidelity and homing behavior of fishes can vary with ontogeny (Yoshiyama et al 1992;Shima et al 2012;White and Brown 2013); older fish are more likely to risk the return to a home site across unfamiliar waters, although this is not always the case for all fishes (White and Brown 2013). Our homing results appear to be consistent with this view, but additional studies are needed to empirically test whether larger S. tubifer are actually more successful at homing than smaller fish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Previous studies have also shown that site fidelity and homing behavior of fishes can vary with ontogeny (Yoshiyama et al 1992;Shima et al 2012;White and Brown 2013); older fish are more likely to risk the return to a home site across unfamiliar waters, although this is not always the case for all fishes (White and Brown 2013). Our homing results appear to be consistent with this view, but additional studies are needed to empirically test whether larger S. tubifer are actually more successful at homing than smaller fish.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Translocation experiments have been used extensively to improve our understanding of how behavioral processes influence movements of a wide range of species, including mammals (Bowman and Fahrig 2002, Bakker 2006, Smith et al 2011, Lawes et al 2013, temperate and tropical birds (Gobeil and Villard 2002, Ibarra-Macias et al 2011, Vergara et al 2013, reptiles (Stanley 1998, Gruber andHenle 2004), amphibians (Mazerolle andDesrochers 2005, Nowakowski et al 2013), fish (Turgeon et al 2010, Shima et al 2012, and insects (Berggren et al 2002, Soderstrom andHedblom 2007). These experiments involve capturing individuals and releasing them across gradients in habitat loss and/or fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immigration of individuals to previously occupied habitat patches during the wet‐to‐dry transition—as observed for a single flood cycle here and over multiple flood cycles by Crook et al ()—could potentially also act as a rescue effect (sensu Brown & Kodric‐Brown, ) at the metacommunity level by dampening species turn‐over rates and inter‐annual variation in species abundance, compared to random dispersal (see Figure ). We note, however, that homing behaviour is not exhibited by all fish species and expression of this behaviour can vary across ontogeny and among individuals within a species (Bélangerz & Rodriguez, ; Crook, ; Shima, McNaughtan, Geange, & Wilkinson, ). The spatial scales over which fish move also varies among taxa, with a general tendency for large‐bodied fishes to exhibit higher levels of vagility than small‐bodied fishes (Griffiths, ; Minns, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%