1999
DOI: 10.1109/mis.1999.747901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontology [6], concept maps [7], frames, rules and constraints [8] are intended to present distinct pieces of knowledge that are worth representing differently. Note that an important distinction is between ontological, factual and rule-based knowledge.…”
Section: Encoded Vs Represented Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology [6], concept maps [7], frames, rules and constraints [8] are intended to present distinct pieces of knowledge that are worth representing differently. Note that an important distinction is between ontological, factual and rule-based knowledge.…”
Section: Encoded Vs Represented Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each knowledge corpus is structured into a special domain-specific ontology [14] and a logical framework. The domain-specific ontology gives a formal and declarative representation of the knowledge domain in terms of explicitly described domain concepts, individuals (or objects) and the relationships between those concepts/individuals.…”
Section: Ascens and Ascens Knowledge Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies can be differentiated in two aspects, conceptual and formal logical nature. According to (Swartout & Tate, 1999), the first aspect has the task of depicting and composing structures of reality. The second addresses the creation of the semantic framework with the definition of objects, classes and contexts.…”
Section: State Of the Art -Modelling Approaches For System Representamentioning
confidence: 99%