2019
DOI: 10.1002/uog.20718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OP08.01: Prenatal prediction of fetal lung maturity using pulmonary artery Doppler and 3D ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were in agreement with Abdelhamid et al, [1] ; Jose et al, [13] ; Mohamed et al, [14] ; Osama et al, [15] ; Aboulghar et al, [16] and Büke et al, [17] . All of them had similar study designs (comparing the fetal main pulmonary artery Doppler with Clinical outcome).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results were in agreement with Abdelhamid et al, [1] ; Jose et al, [13] ; Mohamed et al, [14] ; Osama et al, [15] ; Aboulghar et al, [16] and Büke et al, [17] . All of them had similar study designs (comparing the fetal main pulmonary artery Doppler with Clinical outcome).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in keeping with [ 7 ] were the MPA PI and RI were remarkably higher (2.27 ± 0.23 and 0.8 ± 0.11 cm s −1 versus 2.18 ± 0.23 and 0.76 ± 0.09 cm s −1 ; p : 0.003 and 0.002, respectively), whereas PSV was significantly lower in fetuses with RDS (65.05 ± 5.33 cm s −1 versus 67.21 ± 4.8 cm s −1 ; p : 0.002). Our results are also matching with [ 6 ] were the MPA PI and RI were remarkably higher in fetuses who developed RDS as compared to those with who didn’t (2.51 ± 0.33 and 0.90 ± 0.03 cm s −1 versus 1.96 ± 0.20 and 0.84 ± 0.01 cm s −1 ; p value < 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively). However, according to [ 15 ] other Doppler indices including RI, PI, PSV and S/D were not different between RDS (+) and RDS (−) fetuses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study the PI cut off value of 2.47 (AUC = 0.797, 95% CI; 0.692–0.902, p < 0.001) revealed higher sensitivity (80.8%), yet with much lower specificity (52.3%), while the RI revealed cut off value of 0.8962 (AUC = 0.818, 95% CI; 0.720–0.916, p < 0.001) revealed lower sensitivity (69.2%) and specificity (81.8%) as compared to those of At/Et ratio. This is in keeping with [ 6 ] study were the optimum cut-off was 2.33 for MPA PI (AUC = 0.96; p < 0.001) with accuracy 94.4% while the MPA RI was 0.89 for (AUC = 0.94; p < 0.001with accuracy 88.1%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Case-Control Study at central venous vessels (Ductus venosus and inferior vena cava), and with cardiotocography [4]. In the fetus, the Doppler evaluation of the main pulmonary artery has been shown to be useful in the analysis of the impedance of such vascular systems and changes in those variables have been demonstrated to correlate with gestational age, fetal lung maturity and neonatal outcomes [8,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Adding central arterial Doppler (aortic and pulmonary artery waveforms) may improve management of the fetus with FGR, but studies are lacking on the prospective clinical evaluation of the ventricular outflow tracts Doppler in FGR fetuses.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fetal Main Pulmonary Artery Doppler Wave Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%