Open Access Publishing as a Para-Academic Proposition: OA as Labour Relation

Abstract

Abstract:In this commentary, I ask what is meant by the phrase Open Access (OA)? If OA publishing has emancipatory potential for the publics that are thought to benefit from the practice, why is there so much business as usual? Para-academic practices are about affirming scholarship as a symptom and creating a common good, creating a public knowledge that is a knowledgeable public. It is because OA shares this concern for publics that para-academic practices include OA publishing. By debating the merits of, experimenting with, and invigorating our understanding of OA I believe para-academic practices become more apparently necessary because ultimately OA, like Academia, is haunted by the figure of the public as an already-formed thing.

Open Access Publishing as a Para-Academic Proposition: OA as Labour Relation

“…Elsewhere I've sought to elaborate and further add to what the para-academic proposition might entail, including para-academic publishing as an act of public-making (Boshears 2014). In short, para-academic practices are about affirming scholarship as a symptom (Cohen 2010) and creating a common good, a public knowledge that is a knowledgeable public.…”